E°'NAD+ = - 0.13 V (NAD+ + H+ + 2e–
NADH)
E°'O2 = 0.815 V (1/2 O2 + 2H+ + 2e–
H2O)
E°' = E°'e-acceptor - E°'e-donor
E°' = 0.815 V - (- 0.13 V) = 1.130 V = 1.130 J/C
G°' = -nF
E°' = - (2 mol e-)(96,485 C/mol e-)(1.130 J/C) = 218,056 J/mol = 218.06 J/mol
Assume that the hydrolysis energy of ATP = 30.0 kJ/mol
Efficiency = (actual/possible) x 100%
actual = 2.5 (current accepted value)
possible = 218.6 / 32.0 = 6.83
Efficiency = (2.5 / 6.83) x 100% = 36.6%
(assuming 3.0 ATP/NADH, Efficiency = (3.0 / 6.83) x 100% = 43.9%)
Consider the relative reduction pattern of the ETS in the presence of NADH (highly reduced) oxygen (highly oxidized) and low [ADP].
What would a plot of reduction vs. ETS components (e.g. NADH, FADH2, CoQH2, cyt C, etc.) look like?
Answer:
Click here for a Simulated BAR GRAPH
- Due to tight coupling of ETS to ATP production, the low [ADP] will slow electron transport at each complex where proton pumping occurs (Complexes I, III, and IV).
- Thus the componenets before each step will be more reduced than those after:
- NADH and FADH2 will be highly reduced
- CoQ, cyt b and c1 will be intermediate
- cyt c, cyt a, a3 will be highly oxidized.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Why should this difference exist? (That is, why should evolution favor this lower value of energy for insect flight muscle?) - Because of the high rate of glycolysis in active flight muscle, it is critical to keep glycolysis flux at a high rate. It is thus worth while for the insect to lose some ATP in order to insure a high [NAD+]/[NADH]ratio to insure the Glyceraldehyde-3-P DH reaction does not slow the overall glycolytic flux.
| Reaction | Energy Product | Factor | Multiplier | ATP Equiv. |
|
|
| FACoA Syn. | AMP | -2 | 1 | -2 | -2 | 0 |
| Flavin DH | FADH2 | 1.5 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 8 |
| NAD+ DH | NADH | 2.5 | 8 | 20 | 24 | 8 |
|
NADH | 2.5 x 3 | 9 | 67.5 | 81 | 27 |
| GTP | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | |
| FADH2 | 1.5 | 9 | 13.5 | 18 | 9 | |
Total= |
120 | 146 | 52 | |||
P/O = ATP/O = |
120/52 = 2.31 | 146/52 = 2.81 | ||||
|
|
![]() |
©R A Paselk
Last modified 3 April 2013