If stress is applied to a system at equilibrium, the equilibrium will shift in such a way as to relieve the stress. e.g. if the pressure of carbon dioxide is increased over a solution of carbon dioxide in water, more carbon dioxide will dissolve, reducing the pressure increase. Of course there are other consequences, the system can't just abosorb the carbon dioxide. Note the reaction of carbon dioxide and water,
CO2 + H2O HCO3- + H+
So we should also see a drop in pH, that is it becomes more acidic.
Note that the system we looked at last time (and in your text), the response of the ammonia synthesis reaction to the introduction of nitrogen, is readily understood using Le Châtelier's Principle. The system reponds to the addition of nitrogen by using some, but not all, up. Note that other aspects of the system also reponded.
Let's look at an equilibrium system, and try to predict its response using Le Châtelier's Principle and/or the equilibrium expression.
Example: Consider the reaction
CO + NO2 NO + CO2 + heat (226 kJ)
Note that heat appears on the product side - the system is giving up heat, H is negative, H = - 226 kJ
Writing the equilibrium expression then gives:
K = [NO][CO2]/[CO][NO2]
So, what will happen to [CO2] if we manipulate the reaction in the ways described below? Two ways of approaching: physically or mathematically, that is, we can look at the equation and ask which way it will shift due to concentration change, collisions etc., OR we can look at teh equiilibrium expression and ask how the concentrration terms will respond in order to keep K constant.
CO is added?
[CO2] will increase. The increased [CO] will react more rapidly with NO2, driving the reaction to the right and reducing the amount of CO added. (Looking at K, [CO2] must increase to keep K constant.)
NO2 is added?
[CO2] will increase. The increased [NO2] will react more rapidly with CO, driving the reaction to the right and reducing the amount of NO2 added. (Looking at K, [CO2] must increase to keep K constant.)
NO is added?
[CO2] will decrease. The increased [NO] will react with CO2, driving the reaction to the left. (Looking at K, [CO2] must decrease to keep K constant.)
T is increased?
[CO2] will decrease. If T increases heat must have been added, therefore the reaction will use up some of the extra heat, driving the reaction to the left and lowering the temperature back toward its original value.
V is increased?
[CO2] will decrease in proportion. Although a larger volume will result in a lower pressure (fewer collisions), we have equal numbers of reactants on both sides, so neither side will be favored. (Looking at K, all concentrations reduced by the same factor, so K remains constant without changing proportions of players.)
Ar is added?
No change. Ar is unreactive and will have no effect.
I want to look at solving equilibrium problems, so we'll look at a number of examples and see how to use the equilibrium expression to follow the equilibrium process.
Example: Consider the gas phase reaction at equilibrium :
Find [Cl2] if [PCl5] = 0.40 M and [PCl3] = 0.20 M.
Rearranging, [Cl2] = (5.0 x 10-2)(0.40)/(0.20) = 1.0 x 10-1 M
[Cl2] = 0.10 M
A very common type of reaction is one in which a dissociation takes place.
Example: Consider the gas phase dissociation of carbonyl chloride to carbon monoxide and chlorine @ 100 °C.
If 0.20 moles of carbonyl chloride (COCl2) is placed in a 2.5 L container at 100 °C calculate the concentrations of all species at equilibrium. K = 2.6 x 10-10 @ 100 °C.
|Before reaction||0.20/2.5 = 0.080||0||0|
|@ Equilibrium||0.080 - x||x||x|
Notice that this will give a quadratic equation - yuk! This is to be avoided if possible, if for no other reason than more steps means more opportunities to make a mistake! So we will take advantage of the fact that we are working with experimental work - there is always an error, and if x is smaller than our error, then we can simplify.
The trick is to assume x<< 0.080 and if we look at K, its value (2.6 x 10-10) is small enough that it is likely that our assumption is correct. Note that we MUST write out any assumptions so we understand WHY, in this case, x disappears from the COCl2. So:
[COCl2] = 0.080 M
So far our discussion has dealt only with homogeneous systems, that is all of the components are in the same phase. What about heterogeneous systems where the components occupy different phases. For example look at the gas/solid system below:
We can write the equilibrium expression for this reaction as normal:
K = [CaCO3 (s)] / [CaO(s)][CO2 (g)]
The problem is, what is the concentration of the solids? In a sense each is dissolved in itself and does not change during the reaction (the lumps of stuff can get larger or smaller, but the concentrations remain constant). It turns out, for theoretical reasons we won't go into, the activity or "behavioral concentration" in the pure state is 1. Thus we can put in the concentration of 1 for each solid:
So the equilibrium expression depends only on the concentration of the gas phase, in this case carbon dioxide, and the amounts of solid reactants and products is inconsequential! (Note that in a salt system such as this, the salts set the vapor pressure of the carbon dioxide, giving us a way of creating systems of defined vapor pressure.)
Iron hydroxides in Humboldt County water. Two iron equilibria are involved, ferrous and ferric hydroxides:
Fe(OH)2(s) Fe2+ + 2OH- ; Keq = 1.8x10-15
Fe(OH)3(s) Fe3+ + 3OH- ; Keq = 4x10-38
Bacterial metabolism in the soil results in acidic (low pH) with a very low oxygen content (very low pO2). When this water reachs ferrous hydroxide in "blue clay" deposits the ferrous hydroxide dissolves and percolates through geological formations until it comes up as springs. Contact with the air, with a high oxygen tension, pO2= 0.2 atm, converts the ferrous iron to ferric iron with a much lower solubility and we see yellow-brown "rust" deposits around the springs.
Carbonates, carbon dioxide and acidity. Two equilibrium reactions have very important impacts on a variety of geological (e.g. formation of limestone caves and cave formations) and biological processes (e.g. formation of carbonate based mollusc shells):
CaCO3 (s) + H+ Ca2+ + HCO3-
HCO3- + H+ CO2+ H2O
Discussion of cave formation and effects of changes of atmospheric carbon dioxide/ocean acidity and shell formation.
|Syllabus / Schedule|
© R A Paselk
Last modified 25 April 2011