SED 741 - Dr. Gayle Olson-Raymer
Teaching with Passion and Good Historical Content - What is good history teaching and good historical content?
Below are the discussion guides for today.
Remember, each is separated by a solid line.
______________________________________________________________________
Questions for today:
- What does it mean to teach with passion - especially as explained by Fried in The Passionate Teacher - and to be a good history teacher?
- What is good historical content?
- How does teaching thematically help you become a good history teacher?
Good history teachers..
- Know history, are life long learners, and search for new research and resources to enliven their classroom discussions. Such continue to search for and incorporate new and diverse historical content and innovative teaching methods into their classrooms and revise their beliefs about history as they learn more content.
- Are passionate about history, about teaching history, and about young people. Such teachers demonstrate a genuine interest in and concern for students and an ability to convey a love of history in the classroom setting.
- Create respectful classroom environments. Such teachers hear
their students and respect their voices, allow them to freely express their
intellectual thoughts and personal opinions, encourage students to respect
and listen to diverging viewpoints and attitudes, and continuously use
new teaching methods that fit student needs.
- Are storytellers who make connections between the past and the present. Such teachers show students how the present is illuminated by the past.
- Use the tools of historians, especially primary documents, historiography, and debate. Such teachers teach students to examine primary documents for evidence to support the historical record and their viewpoints, encourage them to raise questions about history, and require them to analyze and compare historian’s competing and often controversial views in the classroom setting.
- Celebrate diversity, model democracy, and teach for social justice. Such teachers create a classroom in which students learn about the multicultural makeup of the American people, teach about democracy and model democratic values, and help students understand that they do their best work when they strive to make society more just.
- Collaborate with colleagues. Such teachers engage in discussions
with colleagues, ask for advice and mentoring, and talk with teachers at
other school sites, educators at professional conferences, and with fellow
subscribers to professional journals.
- Are reflective. Such teachers ask themselves what worked
in their classrooms and what did not, listen to students' positive as well
as negative critiques of their teaching, and then make necessary changes
in both content and method.
- Understand the importance of chronological understanding. Such teachers understand that chronological thinking is at the heart of historical reasoning. Without a clear sense of historical time-time past, present, and future-students are bound to see events as one great tangled mess. Without a strong sense of chronology - of when events occurred and in what temporal order - it is impossible for students to examine relationships among them or to explain historical causality. Chronology provides the mental scaffolding for organizing historical thought.
- Use carefully crafted themes to convey historical content. Such teachers develop a list of overall course themes that provide "bottom
line" messages for their students, create lessons that illustrate the themes,
and encourage students to demonstrate their knowledge of the themes, as
well as critique and create new themes of their own.
Good historical content insures that...
-
History is storytelling in its finest form; it weaves together many related historical and contemporary events and ideas that are linked to a larger story. History is not a recitation of unrelated facts that do not contribute to a larger story.
-
History is interpretive; it invites students to debate multiple perspectives, offer their opinions and educated interpretations, and challenge existing beliefs. History does not dummy down to students by teaching standardized facts that do not encourage open inquiry and honest interpretation.
-
History is revisionist in scope; it is an on-going conversation and a constant process of reexamination that is based upon continual new discoveries and evidence. History is not about an agreed upon set of facts, one indisputably true history, or a forever-fixed story that is never subjected to changes and updates.
-
History is integrative of many disciplines; it especially incorporates geography, literature, art, sociology, economics, and political science. History is not a simple historical chronology of famous dates, incidents, and people.
-
History is inclusive; it ensures that the experiences of all classes, regions, and ethno-racial groups, as well as both genders, are included. History is not restricted to stories written by and about the most well known leaders in American history.
-
History is relevant; it uses past experiences to explain what is important in our lives today. History does not rely solely on the past with no examination of how the past has influenced the present or how it may influence the future.
-
History is experiential; it encourages people to actively experience history, question history, and think about history. History is not static, passive, or reliant upon the mere recitation of facts and dates.
-
History is controversial; it presents all the facts, warts and all, examines both the negative and positive actions of Americans, encourages students to think about social justice and social change, and promotes real understanding of historical issues and events and critical analysis of our nation’s domestic and foreign policies. History is not about one absolute truth, one particular perspective, or one set of facts and figures.
Historiography - Why do historians so often
disagree?
1. The “facts” are seldom straightforward. There are some historical facts that are not in dispute - like Columbus sailed to the Americas in 1492 and slaves resisted slavery. But the reality of these “facts” is complex and difficult to determine. For instance, debate exists about how large the American population was prior to the arrival of Columbus and about whether his actions with the Taino people set genocide into motion; about how many slaves resisted slavery and how such resistance occurred. Furthermore, historians have only spotty records at best to determine the facts and often disagree over definitions - like what is “genocide” and “resistance?”
2. The interpretation of the “facts” differs among historians. These disagreements can be the result of the following:
- The manner in which historical questions are answered - such as those who believe that real knowledge can only be derived from direct, scientific observation of historical “facts”, and revisionists who believe the historical research is not truly objective and must be revised when new information becomes available..
- Political and ideological disagreements - such as among scholars who believe
that economic interests and class divisions are key to interpreting the
facts of our past, and those who believe the culture and ideas help our
understanding of what we have in common as Americans.
- Particular perspectives that people of different backgrounds bring to the
study of history - such as the way that whites and African Americans interpret
the facts of slavery, men and women view suffrage, etc.
3. Historical interpretation changes in response to the time in which it
is written. While historians may strive to be “objective” in their
work, no one can be entirely free from the assumptions and concerns of
the present - especially during times of crisis. For example, during
the Vietnam War, concerns about racial justice and disillusionment with
the war altered the way many historians thought about war and a society
enmeshed in war. These historical events introduced a much more critical
tone to scholarship on the Sixties and Seventies.
4. They encourage us to wonder if there there is such a thing as “truth.” Truth,
some historians argue, does not exist; it is simply a series of interpretative
narratives constructed by people who view life in very different and often
highly personal ways. Others argue that there are not only some very
real truths in history and interpretations are useful without resting on
a solid and truthful foundation.
_______________________________________________________________