Dr. Gayle Olson-Raymer
SED 741 - Social Science Methods Discussion Guides:
Defining and Refining our Tools - How do we our tools of the trade in our classrooms?
Following, please find the discussion guides for this
session.
Television Statistics
In the late 1990s, according to the A.C. Nielsen Co., the average American watches more than 4 hours of TV each day (or 28 hours/week or about 112 hours per month - or 2 months of nonstop TV-watching per year). In a 65-year life, that person will have spent 9 years watching television. The Nielsen report issued in 2009 found that the average American watched more than 153 hours of television/computer programs per month, compared to 151 for 2008 and 145 hours in 2007.
A poll conducted in the U.S in the late 1990s found:
Family Life
- Percentage of households that possess at least one television: 99
- Number of TV sets in the average U.S. household: 2.24
- Percentage of U.S. homes with three or more TV sets: 66
- Number hours per day that TV is on in average U.S. home: 6 hours, 47 minutes
- Percentage of Americans that regularly watch television while eating dinner: 66
- Number of hours of TV watched annually by Americans: 250 billion
- Value of that time assuming an average wage of S5/hour: S1.25 trillion
- Percentage of Americans who pay for cable TV: 56
- Number of videos rented daily in the U.S.: 6 million
- Number of public library items checked out daily: 3 million
- Percentage of Americans who say they watch too much TV: 49
Children
- Percentage of day care centers that use TV during a typical day: 70
- Percentage of parents who would like to limit their children's TV watching: 73
- Percentage of 4-6 year-olds who, when asked to choose between watching TV
and spending time with their fathers, preferred television: 54
- Hours per year the average American youth spends in school: 900 hours
- Hours per year the average American youth watches television: 1500
Violence
- Number murders seen on TV by the time child finishes elementary school: 8,000
- Number of violent acts seen on TV by age 18: 200,000
- Percentage Americans who believe TV violence helps cause real life mayhem: 79
Commercialism
- Number of 30-second TV commercials seen in a year by a child: 20,000
- Number of TV commercials seen by the average person by age 65: 2 million
_______________
Source: TV-Free America:
http://www.csun.edu/~vceed002/health/docs/tv&health.html
Defining and Refining our Tools
Topics for Discussion:
- How do we teach our students to critically watch television?
- Why and how should we use film in our classrooms?
- What are the best uses of current events in our classrooms?
- How can we broaden our use of primary resources in our classrooms? (documents, oral history, photographs, etc.)
- What is History Day and should we get involved?
- What are some ways to use music in our classrooms?
- What are some good ideas for innovative activities in our classrooms?
- How do we abridge primary documents?
- How can we use SIGHT in our classrooms?
Class activity - In breakout rooms, please do the following:
-
On your own or as a group, read the next two sections: "How student decision-making processes are influenced by television," and " Necessary concepts and skills for critical TV viewing." (5 minutes)
- Discuss how you might use the information in these two sections, as well as the information above under "Television Statistics" in your classroom. (10 minutes). Be sure to elect a spokesperson to speak for your group when we come back to discuss this with the entire class.
HOW STUDENT DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES ARE
INFLUENCED BY TELEVISION
1. Television programmers use short scenes which pander to or create
short attention spans. Programmers use the KISS rule - Keep it
short
and simple. Students are trained to expect rapid editing with
fast-paced
action accompanied by simple solutions. Students carry their
short
attention spans and their lack of thought about what they are seeing
into
the schools.
2. Students bring their televised "education" into their
classrooms. Life and reasoning are much more complex than taught on
television.
Yet young people who watch a lot of television tend to arrive at simple
but fallacious solutions.
3. Many students have concluded that thinking abstractly is much
too difficult. They erroneously conclude that if it is
easier
and quicker - just like television - then it must be better. Some
student capacities for abstracting, imagining, and creating are
dwindling
because they are choosing the passive visual experiences rather than
the
active experiences of reading, critically viewing, and critically
thinking.
Relying on images rather than on verified information affects
student
abilities to make knowledge and evidence-based decisions.
4. Most television scripts use vocabularies aimed at the lowest
common
denominator. Students who have consumed large quantities of
television
and have done little serious reading have no way to develop the
vocabularies
necessary to discuss important ideas. The inability to use the
more
abstract symbols of language affects the quality of decisions.
Necessary Concepts and Skills Students
Need
to Become Actively and Critically
Involved with Television Programming
Remember - the average young person spends 4-5 hours a day watching
television!
1. Because television controls our perceptions, we need to
understand
the technical mechanisms used to gain such control. TV
controls
our perceptions in at least four ways: the angle of the camera, the
speed
of the cuts, the number and kind of technical interventions, and the
length
and time for each montage. Let's examine the angle of the camera
- If ex-Marine Colonel Oliver North is pictured during the Iran-Contra
Congressional hearings with the camera pointed up toward him, this
gives
the viewer the "feeling" that North has power and command.
Conversely,
if the camera is shooting down it gives the viewer the "feeling" that
North
does not have power and is not in command. An angle from the side
suggests that he might not be telling the truth. An angle
straight
into his eyes gives the sense that he is being truthful.
2. Because television controls have we "feel" about what is on
the
screen, we need to understand how we are being manipulated. Pictures
affect how we feel about things, and the pictorial language of
television
is the close-up shot. Extreme close-ups suggest intimacy while
long
shots suggest a distant relationship. A fast-paced set of "cuts"
will affect how we perceive the story that is being told while a slow
pace,
with a lot of "dissolves," suggests we should feel something
else.
Music will greatly influence the mood with which we digest the scenes -
as will canned laughter.
3. Because television is edited for an intended effect, we need
to
understand how it is designed to direct our feelings and perceptions. Every
TV show has an intended effect - something the producers and
advertisers
want us to believe. Thus, everything is edited after filming -
even
"live" shows - to meet that intended effect. For instance, if in
the 2003 California Recall/Governor's Election, the director chooses to
"cut away" to Arianna Huffington while "Arnie" is speaking - a specific
message is made. Or if the director "cuts away" to the audience
while
the Green Party candidate is speaking - and the audience is showing
displeasure
- another message is being "sold" to the public.
4. Because television is manipulated technically and by subject
matter
choice, we need to understand the tools used to keep us attentive. In order to keep us attentive, directors must technically manipulate
what
we see on the screen. The average 30-second commercial has 20
technical
manipulations - cuts, zooms, dissolves, etc. - that are used to keep us
focused on what is being sold. Directors must also focus on
bizarre,
controversial, and confrontational subject matter in order to keep us
interested.
Thus, if there is a protest in front of the US Capitol and a
small
amount of violence occurs, the few minutes of violent action is what is
shown rather than the hours of quiet protest.
5. Because television is about the business of making money, we
need
to be aware of this influence on what we watch. Commercial
television
networks pay the Nielsen television rating's service to determine the
number
of people who are watching a particular program. If people are
watching,
advertisers will pay to reach them; if they are not watching, their
profitability
will be low and they will not pay. Television broadcasters show
what
people WANT - we control the market!
Why we should use film in our classrooms
1. The film message is too important to leave to amateurs - students
need teachers to help them understand the message.
2. Some topics require the use of film.
3. Film can communicate a moment in time with a power and precision
that personal memoirs and history textbooks often cannot achieve.
4. If we ignore the influence popular cinema plays in the lives of
our
students, we are also ignoring their perspectives.
O'Connor's Guide to Film Analysis*
Film is best analyzed using the techniques of traditional historical
analysis. This involves a two-stage analytical process:
1. Stage One: Analyze the film in terms of:
-
Content - What is pictured and what is being said? What is missing?
-
Production - How did it come to portray what it does? When was it
made?
Who directs and stars in the film?
-
Reception - What sense did people make of it when it was first made and
how did it influence attitudes and events over time?
2. Stage Two: Analyze within three major frameworks -
moving-image
documents as:
-
Representations of history - What is the point of view of the major
characters,
of the theme, and are they adequate representations of history?
How
does the point of view come across? Are the films messages direct
and obvious, or more subtle and implied?
-
Evidence for social and cultural history - How accurate are the props
and
costumes in terms of providing actual social and cultural
representations?
What are the obvious and the more subtle visual clues in the
film?
What role does music play? What does the film say about power
structures?
-
Evidence for historical fact - How accurate is the story line?
Dialog?
Message? What's missing?
These are the same questions historians ask when analyzing any
document!
-------------------------------------------
* John E. O'Connor and Martin A. Jackson, American History/American
Film: Interpreting the Hollywood Image (NY: Ungar Publishing Co,
1979).
Toplin's reasons to use Hollywood feature films
These reasons can be applied to the use of entire films in the classroom, the use of films for extra credit, and the use of snippets of films to hook student interest.
Resources for Teaching about Film
To Read:
- Chadwick, Bruce. The Reel Civil War: Mythmaking in
American
Film. NY: Vintage, 2001.
- Magazine of History, Vol. 16, No. 4. "Film in
History.
(Summer 2002).
- O'Connor, John E. (ed.) Image as Artifact: The Historical
Analysis
of Film and Television. Malabar, FL: R.E. Krieger Publishing
Co., 1990.
- Schnickl, Richard. Good Morning, Mr. Zip Zip Zip: Movies,
Memory,
and World War II. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2003.
- Toplin, Robert Brent. History By Hollywood: The Use and
Abuse
of the American Past. Champagne-Urbana: University of
Illinois
Press, 1996.
- Toplin, Robert Brent. Reel History: In Defense of
Hollywood. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press, 2002.
Online:
- History in the Movies, Historical accuracy of films, http://www.stfrancis.edu/content/historyinthemovies/
- Teach with Movies (subscription), http://www.teachwithmovies.org/
- Using films in the classroom, http://www.bfi.org.uk/education/teaching/witm/classroom.html#introduction
- Teaching Bad History – Without Badly Teaching History, http://history-and-education.blogspot.com/2008/04/teaching-bad-history-without-badly.html
- Teaching History Through Film, http://mediapede.org/filmhistory/
- AP Central: Teaching History with Movies, http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/members/homepage/35668.html
- Teaching History with YouTube, American Historical Association, http://www.historians.org/Perspectives/issues/2008/0805/0805tec2.cfm
- History Place, Hollywood’s Best History Films, http://www.historyplace.com/films/index.html
_________________________________________________________________________________
Ideas for Using Current Events and Political Cartoons in the Classroom
Resources for Current Events:
- http://www.cnn.com/studentnews - CNN Student News is designed for students wanting to learn more about the news. Great if students have internet access in the classroom.
- http://www.npr.org - National Public Radio. NPR’s site has a daily synopsis of the major news stories broadcast during the day. You can also access the actual audio portion of most reports. The archives section also provides useful current events information.
- http://news.bbc.co.uk - British Broadcasting Corporation News. The BBC’s site has a daily synopsis of its major news stories. The full report is available on the “big” stories, as well as a section on related stories over the past few months.
- http://www.sfgate.com - San Francisco Chronicle. Most major stories are available in entirety.
- http://www.guardian.co.uk/guardian - The Guardian. National morning newspaper includes daily stories and sections, weekly supplements by day, and searchable archives
- http://www.nytimes.com - The New York Times - Online edition of the newspaper's recent content with searchable archives for a fee. [Registration required]
- http://www.nytimes.com/pages/todayspaper/index.html - Use the "Today's Paper" page to see all the headlines from the Final City Edition of each day in the New York Times.
- http://online.wsj.com/home-page - Use the Wall Street Journal to help students learn more about economics. In 2011, the Wall Street Journal was voted the most popular paper in the U.S.
Resources for Teaching Current Events:
Resources for Political Cartoons and Teaching with Political Cartoons
- A Brief History of Political Cartoons (three parts – click on “go on” at the bottom of Part I to access the next two parts), http://xroads.virginia.edu/~MA96/PUCK/part1.html
- PBS, Lesson Plan: Analyzing Election Cartoons, http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/teachers/lessonplans/socialstudies/Vote2004/political_cartoons.html
- Teachers Guide to Daryl Cagle’s Political Cartoons, http://www.cagle.com/teacher/
- Political Cartoons Illustrating Progressivism and the Election of 1912, http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/election-cartoons/
- Presidential Elections through Carttons, Harp-Week, http://elections.harpweek.com/default.asp
- Cartoonist Thomas Nast vs. Candidate Horace Greeley, the Election of 1872 in Harper’s Weekly, http://nastandgreeley.harpweek.com/default.asp
- On this Day... Political Cartoons from history via the New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/learning/general/onthisday/harp/0325.html
- The Opper Project, Using Editorial Cartoons to Teach History, http://hti.osu.edu/opper/lesson-plans
Next week's assignment:
- Each person will pick one of the 9 "Tools of the Trade" listed below.
- general document collections
- letters
- speeches
- oral history
- photographs
- History Day
- Music
- Mock Trials, Simulations, and other Creative Approaches
- Debates
As you look at these tools, you will notice that some have several resources and others have only 1 or 2. Don't use these as guidelines for your choices.
- Each person will review each of the resources and be prepared to discuss how useful they are to the classroom with your peers next time we meet.
- Each person will find at least two other online resources and be prepared to share them with their colleagues next time we meet. These must be submitted to me no later than Tuesday so I can add them to the list for next week's discussion.
Tools of the Trade: Selected Online Resources
National Archives Document Worksheets http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/worksheets/
General Document Collections
Letters:
Speeches:
Oral History
Photographs:


History Day - http://www.nationalhistoryday.org/index.htm
Music
Mock Trials, Simulations, and other creative approaches
- American Bar Association Mock Trial Guide, www.abanet.org/publiced/mocktrialguide.pdf
- Constitutional Rights Foundation Mock Trial Resources, http://www.crfc.org/mocktrial.html
- Mock Trials for the Classroom, http://www.peterpappas.com/journals/trial.htm
- Two mock trial/simulation websites:
- http://historicalsimulations.com/default.html. This website provides information on what simulations are and the benefits of using them. Plus, it provides examples of simulations that we can use in our classrooms such as games to demonstrate what happened at the Treaty of Versailles and the Yalta Conference. There is even a game for the Gilded Age, which seems to be one of the trickiest parts of US History to make interesting to students.
- http://www.19thcircuitcourt.state.il.us/services/Pages/mock_trials. This website is useful because it provides information on how to actually make a mock trial successful in the classroom. However, some of the links are broken (for example, the key link which is supposed to lead us to a library of mock trials does not work) and so it is not the best website for actual lesson plans or mock trial examples. This is just useful because it has some good tips for organizing this activity.
- Columbia University American History Online Classroom Simulations, http://caho-test.cc.columbia.edu/sim/view_all.html
- Teaching Tolerance, “Classroom Simulations: Proceed with Caution,” http://www.tolerance.org/teach/magazine/features.jsp?is=42&ar=896
- You are the Historian - Presidential Leadership Simulation at http://users.humboldt.edu/ogayle/TAH/YouAreHistorian.html
- The Historical Cheeseburger and Cola at http://www.globaled.org/curriculum/ffood1.html and "Patterns of Food Introduction into the United States" at http://www.globaled.org/curriculum/ffood2.html
Debate:

The Boston Tea Party – An Historical and Contemporary Analysis
(Note: this article was condensed from and informed by an article to be published by Ray Raphael, " Tea Party Myths: What you didn't learn in school about the legendary brouhaha in Boston that helped spark our revolution.")
Introduction: We all know that on December 16, 1773, several dozen men dressed up as Mohawk Indians and cut open 340 chests of tea belonging to the East India Company and dumped the contents in Boston’s harbor.
- Revolutionary Era Americans, though, didn’t celebrate the event. This might seem strange, since they were certainly the celebrating sort.
- They staged festive ceremonies to commemorate anniversaries —the first Stamp Act protest, the Act’s repeal, the Boston Massacre, the Declaration of Independence — but the “action against tea” or the “destruction of the tea” (as they variously called it) went unheralded in public ritual.
- For a half century, Americans shunned the tale, and certainly did not call it a Tea Party. At first, they didn’t dare. Anyone who had anything to do with the event could face prosecution, or at least a lawsuit. Privately, some people knew who was behind those Indian disguises, but publicly, nobody spoke a word.
- Moreover, many of those who had opposed imperial policies viewed the destruction of tea as an act of vandalism that put the Revolution in a bad light.
- Americans also downplayed the tea action because of its devastating impact. That single act precipitated a harsh retaliation from the British, which in turn led to a long and ugly war.
So the questions for our classroom discussion are: What was the Boston Tea Party and Does it have any relationship to the current Tea Party Movement? To answer the question, we are going to examine several myths:
- Myth 1: The dispute was about higher taxes
- Reality: The dispute was a protest against huge corporate tax cuts for the British East India Company; it was not about a tax decrease for the colonists.
- In 1772, the East India Company was hard hit by the collapse of speculative banking schemes throughout Europe, and its stock tumbled. Goods accumulated in warehouses, unsold, and Company directors lobbied the British government for laws that would make it easy for them to put their small business competitors out of business.
- Most of the members of the British government and royalty (including the king) were stockholders in the East India Company, so it was easy to get laws passed in its interests. Among the Company's biggest problems were colonial entrepreneurs, who ran their own small ships to bring tea and other goods directly into America without routing them through Britain or through the Company.
- Members of Parliament — like American congressmen today — staged committee hearings in which they grandstanded against greedy company officials, who had returned from India with huge fortunes and declared large dividends despite the company’s overwhelming debts. Meanwhile, they tried to figure out how to get the company, and the empire, out of the mess.
- As MPs debated the advisability of a government takeover, they also discussed schemes for unloading the company’s 18 million pounds of surplus of tea. The European market was already saturated, but the American market was not. In theory, the East India Company could sell many tons of tea there if taxes on the shipments were lowered.
- Under the 1773 Tea Act, the East India Company could deliver its product straight to American consumers, untouched by middlemen and almost untaxed, save for a modest American import duty. This corporate tax cut threatened to decimate small colonial tea shops by helping the East India Company.
- The bottom line: For American colonists, the giant corporate interests should not be considered above their own interests. To end such unfair treatment, the fundamental issue for the colonists was self-governance - whoever levied taxes got to call the shots, including how to spend the money.. No more “taxation without representation” was their rallying cry, not “down with high taxes.”
- Myth 2: Tea taxes were a difficult burden on ordinary Americans
- Reality: The colonial tax burden came not from Parliament, but from taxes and poll taxes assessed by their own colonial assemblies, as well as long-standing import duties on sugar, molasses and wine. The tea tax was a relic of the Townshend Revenue Act of 1767, which also placed import duties on paint, paper, lead, and glass.
- At three pence per pound, the tax on tea was barely felt by American consumers, who also had access to the smuggled competition.
- Still, the tea tax had symbolic importance of the growing rift in colonial society. Common folk might enjoy a sip or two of tea, but participating in the ritual of teatime—with an elaborate array of fancy crockery and silver utensils—was prohibitively expensive for the vast majority of Americans. So calls for a continued boycott of tea dovetailed nicely with lower-class resentments.
- Moreover, the consumption of tea was deemed suspect, even sinful, to a large segment on the American public. “That bainfull weed,” as Abigail Adams called it, was an artificial stimulant, what we would call today a recreational drug. One concerned partriot writer, in a Virginia newspaper, claimed that ever since tea had been introduced into western society, “our race is dwindled and become puny, weak, and disordered to such a degree, that were it to prevail a century more we should be reduced to mere pigmies.”
- Pointing to his medical expertise, Boston’s Dr. Thomas Young declared authoritatively that tea was not just a “pernicious drug,” as some assumed, but a “slow poison, and has the corrosive effect upon those who handle it. I have left it off since it became political poison, and have since gained in firmness of constitution. My substitute is camomile flowers.”
- The bottom line: Tea drinking was something the colonists enjoyed, but not equally. Common folk enjoyed tea, but were not involved in the upper class ritual of tea drinking with elaborate tea trays and utensils.
- Myth #3: Dumping British Tea United the Patriots
- Reality: The immediate effect was just the opposite. For American who called themselves patriots, the slogan “liberty and property” was a common rallying cry, shouted at least as often as “taxation without representation.” George Washington, among many others, chided Bostonians for “their conduct in destroying tea.” Benjamin Franklin was hardly alone when he argued the East India Company should be compensated for the ruined tea.
- It was not the destruction of tea that united Americans, but the punishments administered several months later through a series of laws called the Coercive Acts by Parliament and the Intolerable Acts by the colonists.
- Parliament closed the port of Boston and revoked the Massachusetts Charter, denying citizens the rights they had enjoyed for a century-and-one-half.
- The goal of the Coercive Acts was to isolate radicals in Massachusetts, but instead the 13 colonies formed the Continental Congress and agreed to mount a general boycott of British goods.
- In the 1820s, Americans a new generation of chroniclers toned down the truly revolutionary aspects of the action against tea and played up the carnival atmosphere. More than 50 years after the event was over, the event was informally christened the Boston Tea Party.
- When simplified, the event loses not only its revolutionary punch but also its political and economic context.
- The bottom line: It was not the destruction of tea that united Americans, but the punishments administered several months later through a series of laws called the Coercive Acts by Parliament and the Intolerable Acts by the colonists.
In short ...
- The Boston Tea Party occurred in response to a corporate tax break that lowered the price of tea in America.
- It was not a “party” conducted in a carnival atmosphere – it was an illegal act of vandalism committed against property owners.
- It did not unite all Americans – many of whom were repulsed by the property crime; it was the Coercive/Intolerable Acts that finally united enough Americans to support the war effort.
Resources for teaching about the Tea Party Movement