Humboldt County Ballot Initiative to Ban Genetically Modified Organisms

 

Mark S. Wilson, Humboldt State University, Department of Biology

 

Examples of GMOs

 

Insulin-producing bacteria

The first commercial GMO, created in 1978 at UC San Francisco, was a bacterium that produces human insulin.  Insulin is a protein hormone that regulates the concentration of glucose in the blood. Humans with diabetes cannot produce insulin normally, and therefore need to rely on an outside source of this hormone to maintain normal glucose levels. In the 1920s, people started isolating insulin from cows and pigs to treat human diabetes, but there were problems related to the safety, purity, reliability, and amount of insulin that could be obtained in this way.  Because of this GMO, diabetics today are assured of a reliable and inexpensive supply of insulin.  A number of other medically-important proteins are now produced by similar GMOs.

 

Vaccine-producing microorganisms

A number of recombinant (transgenic/GMO) vaccines are now produced and used. One example is a recombinant vaccine that confers protection against Hepatitis B virus. The viral gene for production of a surface protein was inserted into a strain of yeast, which produces the protein in large quantity.  Purified protein can be injected intramuscularly to initiate the development of protective antibodies. This vaccine, approved for use since 1986, is promoted by the World Health Organization as a safe and effective tool in the prevention of hepatitis B infections, which kill more than 1 million people annually.  More than 116 countries include this vaccine in their routine immunization routines. Numerous other vaccines are made in this fashion, replacing blood-derived vaccines and more dangerous live attenuated viral vaccines.

 

Corn/Soybeans/Canola/Cotton

The most common crop GMOs are plants that have been modified in some way to make them easier for farmers to grow.  Unlike with insulin-producing bacteria, the goal of these modifications is not to create a product that is better for the consumer, just for the farmer. These include crops that produce bacterial proteins that are toxic to insect larvae and thus, at least theoretically, reduce the need for expensive and dangerous applications of insecticides.  They also include crops that can withstand herbicide applications (i.e. Roundup-Ready crops).

 

These products are the ones that have caused the most controversy to date. Some of the factors contributing to the controversy are that there is no health benefit for the consumers of these products, they are grown in large quantity, and people tend to consume a lot of these foods. The manufacturers would probably claim that these crops are cheaper to produce, and that is an economic benefit for the consumer. Additionally, farmers are able to reduce applications of dangerous chemicals, and switch to less toxic chemicals, which in theory provides a universal benefit. The environmental costs/benefits of these crops are hard to calculate, but some farmers have chosen these crops because they are more compatible with no-till and low-till approaches that reduce loss of topsoil.

 

More recent modifications have focused on consumer health benefits rather than benefits for the farmers. For example, researchers at UC Berkeley are working to lower or eliminate allergy-causing proteins from common foods such as mlk and wheat. Hypoallergenic soybeans have also been developed. Other varieties of soybeans have been modified to be lower in linoleic acids, which will reduce the amount of hydrogenated fats in soy-based margarine and shortening. Hydrogenated fats reduce the level of HDL (good cholesterol) in humans, while raising the overall cholesterol levels.  Hydrogenated fats thus increase the risk for heart disease. Other modifications for consumer benefit include soybeans higher in monounsaturated fats and omega-3 fatty acids, which may help reduce the risk of heart disease.

 

Golden Rice

Golden Rice is a transgenic rice that has been modified to produce beta-carotene, which humans can convert to Vitamin A. Golden rice is to be distributed free to farmers in the developing world in the hopes of alleviating Vitamin A deficiency, which is implicated in more than one million deaths and 350,000 cases of childhood blindness each year.  Because Vitamin A deficiency is such a serious problem, Golden Rice is frequently touted as an excellent example of how beneficial GMO technology can be.  Several biotechnology companies, including Monsanto, Syngenta AG and Bayer AG, waived their patent rights during the development of Golden Rice varieties, perhaps in part because of the public relations benefits.

 

In an effort to find fault with Golden Rice, critics of GMOs point out that an individual would need to eat a large amount of rice to ingest the US Recommended Daily Allowance of beta-carotene.  They usually fail to mention that the US RDA is set to help prevent long-term health problems such as cancer, and that a significantly lower amount can greatly reduce deaths and blindness due to Vitamin A deficiency. In addition, newer varieties with more beta-carotene are being developed, and similar approaches are being used to enhance the beta carotene content of other crops such as mustard. Mustard oil is commonly used for cooking in India and Asia, where vitamin A deficiency is common. At this point, Golden Rice is still a few years away from being ready for large-scale distribution.

 

Faster-growing salmon

Another controversial case is transgenic salmon, several varieties of which have been engineered.  One type produces growth hormone all year round instead of seasonally, so that it reaches full size in half the time that it takes wild salmon to mature.  This organism does not have a gene from another fish, but it does use a gene promoter that is transgenic.  The promoter is the switch that causes the growth hormone gene to be turned on, and the new promoter results in the gene always being on.

 

Concerns about these fish include the possibility that when they escape (which they will, based on the record of fish farms) they will out-compete native salmon.  Many salmon species are already threatened because of habitat destruction and over-fishing, and might not be able to survive this additional insult.  There is also the concern that these fish might interbreed with native varieties, thus changing natural populations with unpredictable ecosystem-level effects.

 

Advocates for transgenic salmon say that only sterile females are produced, which greatly reduces the chances of problems. They also believe that farmed fish are so poorly fit for natural habitats (for example, because they are used to eating fish food rather than obtaining resources from the natural world) that it is unlikely that escaped fish ever could cause these kinds of problems.

 

Other GMOs

A variety of other GMOs are being grown.  For example, a transgenic papaya that is resistant to the papaya ringspot virus has been grown in Hawaii since 1998.

 

 

 

previous topic, What is a GMO?

 

next topic, GMOs under development

 

Introductory Page