SOME ALL-PURPOSE
STUDY QUESTIONS FOR DIASPORA POETRY
Many
of us are needlessly panicky about poetry (something to do with 7th-grade
English is my guess); we think it's some rarified, flowery form of language that
only sensitive, misunderstood types who've really suffered can fathom. Sure, there
are insufferable posers who pretend that poetry is only that; but for most of
the rest of us, modern lyric poetry is what we
put in our
CD
players every day.
The point of this class is to see how "serious" that poetry is.
That calls for serious questions, which we may not be equipped with the
right tools to even pose, much less answer.
So if you're intimidated, stop: ask
yourself some of these questions in order to get thinking productively about the
poems you're reading and hearing, and to begin teaching yourself how to
recognize, describe and analyze poetic form.
What
kinds of preconceptions, if any, do you have about poetry, poets, and their
peculiar language and conventions? How/how
much do any of these poems clash with your preconceptions?
How
do you hear these poems in your head when you read them on the page?
How does your "internal audition" compare with actually hearing
them performed out loud? (How much
of a problem is language or orthography? Are
there rhymes or rhythms that wouldn't exist in "standard" English?)
How
important is each performer's particular voice—how do their styles of delivery
vary (in speed, pitch, timbre, enunciation, etc.)?
Would anyone else ever be able to perform their poems as effectively, do
you think?
Are
the "a cappella" poems (if there are any) more or less effective than
those with music, or does it depend?
How
do you see jokes, puns, and other wordplay working in any of these poems—as a
distraction, an embellishment, the main point?
Why
are some poems short and compact, others long and sprawling?
What can one structure do that another can't?
What characteristics of the African-derived performance traditions mentioned by Thompson and Roberts show up in any of these poems? (How and where?)
Some
questions to ask of any poem, performed or not:
Who's
speaking? To whom (named or
implied)? About what (what's
literally "happening" or being being said, in plain language)?
How would you characterize the speakers(s)?
Are there any rhythms or tensions set up by shifting between
speakers, personae, or points of view?
What's
the overall "mood" of the poem and its subjective effect on you?
Can you pinpoint some of the elements which built that mood?
How's
the poem structured: how long
are the lines and stanzas, and what kind of groups or sections are they
organized into? Any reason
behind this, that you can see?
What
seems to be the primary function of the poem:
to emote, meditate, philosophize, teach, rant, tell a story, boast or
ridicule, play with words (not the only possibilities)?
What
kind of a beat or rhythm is there? Is
it steady, or does it change or vary? Where,
why, and how? Does the musical
beat reinforce or cut across the speech rhythms and/or rhyme patterns?
Close
detective work: What words,
phrases, or rhymes (or variations on them) get repeated?
How are techniques like assonance (the repetition of vowel sounds
within words—I went home in the gloaming) or alliteration
(the repetition of initial consonant or vowel sounds—wild and woolly)
used to emphasize something or to build up certain ideas over a section or
an entire poem? What about
"internal rhymes" (rhymes within one line, rather than at the end
of two lines in a couplet or quatrain)?
What's innovative or extraordinary about the formal, technical or performative features of this poem—or, by contrast, what traditions does it seem to quote or come out of?