---------- Biological Basis of Behavior ------ ----
---------- SPRING, 2005 ----------

                            
                            
                       BIOLOGICAL BASIS OF BEHAVIOR

Psychology 321                     	                   
Spring, 2005					HGH 225
Dr. John M. Morgan                 	MWF, 8am to 9:00                                                   



Chemistry of Psilocybin and Synaptic Transmitters Involved
By: Hannah Rich

       Psilocybin is a type of hallucinogenic mushroom that is 
ingested by eating the raw fungi.  The mushroom can also be made 
into a tea and drunk. In some of the later studies done on 
psilocybin, the drug was synthetically produced and then either 
inhaled or injected by an IV. The drug enters the blood stream 
and can cross the blood brain barrier because of it relative 
metabolic similarity to serotonin (Fuller 1985). This means that 
since psilocybin is chemical resemblance to the neurotransmitter 
serotonin, psilocybin can trick the protein channels embedded in 
the membrane of the blood vessel and pass through as if it were 
serotonin and not a drug. Psilocybin (4phosphodimethyltryptamine 
or N, N dimethyltryptamine (DMT)) is a naturally occurring 
indoleamine hallucinogen and is metabolized to psilocin after 
ingestion (Umbricht, Koller, Vollenweider, Schmid, 2001). 
Psilocin is the active chemical in the plant and it is what 
causes hallucinations and other behavioral changes in the 
individual taking the substance. It is stated that psilocybin is 
used in research because it is short-acting, naturally occurring 
and draws less attention then other well-know hallucinogens 
(Strassman 1996). There are not many studies done with human 
subjects so the majority of data has been collected with animals 
(rats in particular). In many articles the effects, both 
neurological and behavioral are likened to the effects of the 
hallucinogen LSD.    
       The hallucinogen psilocybin is considered to be a monoamine 
related substance that is mediated by the effects of activity by 
serotonergic systems in the central nervous system (Grilly 
1998). When talking about the serotonergic systems that are 
affected by the drug Psilocybin the research is focusing on the 
central systems and not the periphery nerve networks. The drug 
is considered to be part of the indolealkylamine group and is 
classified in the chemical class of tryptamines. A number of 
indolealkylamines that are hallucinogenic can be divided into 
three basic groups, tryptamine derivatives, beta-carbolines, and 
lysergic acid derivatives (Glennon 1985, Nichols and Glennon 
1984). Psilocybin is tryptamine derived. The indole nucleus of 
serotonin is commonly found in the chemical class of tryptamines 
(Abraham, Aldridge, Gogia 1996). Psilocybin in one of the best 
studied tryptamine derivatives and is related to other 
indolealkylamines that are derived from various plants (Nichols 
and Glennon 1996).   
       Psilocybin and other indolealkylamines chemically resemble 
the neurotransmitter serotonin (Kalat 2004, Glennon 1985).  
Hallucinogenic agents such as psilocybin have a serotonin 
receptor affinity which means that psilocybin has a tendency to 
bind to a particular type of receptor, which in this case are 
serotonin receptors (Glennon 1985). In experiments done by 
Glennon (1985) it was found that indolealkylamine analogues 
(psilocybin) were found to interact with the serotonin receptors 
in a competitive manner which gives rise to the hypothesis that 
psilocybin has a preference for a specific serotonergic 
receptor. The tendency for indoleamine hallucinogens such as 
psilocybin to bind to the serotonin receptors is also highly 
correlated with their hallucinogenic potency in humans (Umbricht 
et al 2001, Abraham et al 1996).
       Psilocybin is a serotonin agonist, which means that the 
drug mimics or increases the effects of the neurotransmitter 
serotonin (Kalat 2004, Kruk and Pycock, 1979). Psilocybin is a 
direct agonist because it mimics the action of serotonin on 
tissue receptors (Fuller 1985). This direct agonist of serotonin 
decreases the rate of serotonin synthesis and turnover in the 
brain (Fuller 1985). 
       According to Kalat, psilocybin and similar drugs stimulate 
the serotonin type 2 receptors (5HT2A) at inappropriate times 
and for longer than usual durations (Kalat 2004, Vollenweider 
1999). Other sources state that psilocybin is a mixed 5HT2A and 
5HT1A receptor agonist (Vollenweider, Vontobel, Hell, Leenders, 
1999). Some researches say that since the actions and properties 
of the receptors are still not completely known it is accepted 
that drugs such as psilocybin affect both receptors but with 
different affinities. Vollenweider and colleges state that the 
serotonin agonist psilocybin binds with high affinity at 5HT2A 
receptors and to a lesser extent at 5HT1A receptors (1999).  
Another article contradicts that statement and says that 
psilocybin has nearly equal affinity for both receptor sites 
(Strassman 1996). 
       New data also indicates that psilocybin may also influence 
dopamine systems.  Experiments done by Vollenweider and colleges 
raised the possibility of that symptoms of psilocybin may be 
secondary responses to increased dopaminergic transmission, 
presumably through a serotonin dopamine interaction 
(Vollenweider et al 1999). It is stated that psilocybin has no 
direct affinity for dopamine receptors but when the 5HT2A 
receptors are located on dopaminergic neurons within the 
striatum and nucleus accumbens an exchange might take place 
between serotonin and dopamine resulting in a serotonin mediated 
psilocybin induced dopamine release (Vollenweider et al 1999). 
It is thought according to these concepts that psilocybin may 
increase dopamine release through 5HT receptor activation; this 
is through activation of both 5HT1A and 5HT2A receptors 
(Vollenweider et al 1999). Although this is just a hypothesis 
the possibility of the relationship can not be ruled out.       
        Presynaptic serotonergic receptors, according to Kruk and 
Pycock (1979), are thought to exist on the serotonergic cell 
bodies and dendrites in the raphe nuclei. The raphe nuclei and 
the reticular formation (which controls the altering of 
consciousness) are found within the medulla which contains 
nuclei for several cranial nerves (Kruk and Pycock 1979, Kalat 
2004). The raphe nuclei are thought to contain clusters of 
serotonergic neurons and send axons to the forebrain, increasing 
or decreasing the brain's readiness to respond to stimuli 
(Jacobs 1985, Kalat 2004). 
       The distribution of 5HT receptors in the CNS forms a 
network with the cell bodies of the major 5HT neurons residing 
in the midline raphe nuclei. The densest aggregation of 
serotonergic cell bodies is found in the dorsal and median raphe 
nuclei (Jacobs 1985). Axons then ascend into the basal ganglia, 
hypothalamus, thalamus, hippocampus, limbic forebrain and areas 
of the cerebral cortex (Kruk and Pycock 1979). These axons 
project to virtually all portions of the central nervous system 
(Jacobs 1985). The functions of 5HT receptors are varied and 
include the control of mood and behavior, motor activity, 
feeding and the control of hunger, thermoregulation, sleep, and 
certain hallucinatory states (Kruk and Pycock 1979). 
       According to Leysen (1985), the serotonin 5HT1 and 5HT2 
sites represent two distinct types of binding sites, each with 
different drug binding properties and distinct distribution in 
the brain. As of 1985 only the 5HT2 sites had been demonstrated 
to be in control of multiple roles. All of these roles were 
considered to be serotonin induced, some of the roles included: 
behavioral excitation in rodents, impaired blood circulation, 
provoked inflammation, and the perception of subjective feelings 
(Leysen 1985).      
       It has been found that some serotonergic autoreceptors are 
located on the serotonin containing neurons in the dorsal raphe 
nucleus, to be more specific the autoreceptors are found at the 
presynaptic nerve endings (Moret 1985). The cell bodies of these 
autoreceptor serotonergic neurons are located in the raphe 
nuclei and project into various brain regions such as the 
cortex, hippocampus, hypothalamus and the corpus striatum (Moret 
1985). These serotonergic autoreceptors remain completely 
available to agonists that are added into surrounding fluid. 
This is because endogenous transmitters do not appear to reach 
concentrations high enough to activate the receptors (Moret 
1985). Endogenous serotonin refers to the serotonin that is 
innate to the individual. It is the serotonin that the body 
makes to carry out its functions. Other substances, like for 
instance psilocybin, need to be inserted into the body and then 
the serotonin receptors require these chemically similar 
molecules to fit into the receptors to activate the neuron. Many 
of the serotonergic neurons are thought to be endogenously 
active because they display a slow, regular firing rate without 
a connection to any presynaptic cell (Jacobs 1985). 
       Since the serotonergic neurons in the raphe nuclei comprise 
a group of cells that share many characteristics including 
responses to various stimuli, drugs or physiological variables, 
the group of serotonergic neurons is called a system.  This 
serotonergic system works together to produce integrated 
functional effects that are also global in nature (Jacobs 1985). 
This serotonergic system is a major site for the action of 
hallucinogenic drugs (Jacobs 1985). It is thought to be the site 
for the phenomena of hallucinations. This system refers to the 
central serotonergic system and not the peripheral system. 
       According to Jacobs (1985), serotonergic neurons comprise 
the site at which many drugs, including hallucinogens, exert a 
significant portion of their action. Jacobs states that these 
neurons therefore constitute an essential interface between such 
drugs and their physiological and behavioral effects (1985). 
       Research on the hallucinogenic drug psilocybin has 
encountered many setbacks including the limited number of human 
research participants and the difficulty of administering 
hallucinogenic drugs to humans. The research on serotonin has 
been very extensive in the last twenty years but researchers 
still do not know what the specific functions of the different 
receptors are. In researching psilocybin the research available 
seemed quite outdated but the journal articles provided more 
recent discoveries. The research on psilocybin, as well as for 
other hallucinogens, is far from complete and there are many 
more discoveries to be made in the neurophyscopharmacology of 
hallucinogenic drugs.    

References

Abraham, H.D., Aldridge, A.M., and Gogia, M.B. (1996). The 
psychopharmacology of hallucinogens. Neurophyscopharmacology. 
14, 285.

       Fuller, R.W. (1985). Drugs altering serotonin synthesis and 
metabolism. In Neuropharmacology of Serotonin (ed. A.R. Green) 
p.1. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

       Glennon, R.A. (1985). Involvement of serotonin in the 
action of hallucinogenic agents. In Neuropharmacology of 
Serotonin (ed. A.R. Green) p.253. Oxford University Press, 
Oxford.

       Grilly, D.M. (1998). Drugs and Human Behavior. Allyn and 
Bacon, Boston.
       
       Jacobs, B.L. (1985). An overview of brain serotonergic unit 
activity and its relevance to the Neuropharmacology of 
serotonin. In Neuropharmacology of Serotonin (ed. A.R. Green) 
p.196. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

       Kalat, J.W. (2004). Biological Psychology. Wadsworth, 
United States. 
        
       Kruk, Z.L., Pycock, C.J. (1979). Neurotransmitters and 
Drugs. p.94-104. University Park Press, Baltimore.

       Leysen, J.E. (1985). Characterization of serotonin receptor 
binding sites. In Neuropharmacology of Serotonin (ed. A.R. 
Green) p.79. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

       Moret, C. (1985). Pharmacology of the serotonin 
autoreceptor. In Neuropharmacology of Serotonin (ed. A.R. Green) 
p.21. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
       
       Nichols, D.E., and Glennon, R.A. (1984). Medicinal 
chemistry and structure activity relationships of hallucinogens. 
In Hallucinogens: Neurochemical, Behavioral, and Clinical 
Perspectives (ed. B.L. Jacobs) p.95. Raven Press, New York. 
       
       Strassman, R.J. (1996). Human psychopharmacology of N, N-
dimethyltryptamine. Behavioral Brain Research. 73, 121.

       Umbricht, D., Koller, R., Vollenweider, F.X., and Schmid, 
L. (2001). Mismatch negativity predicts psychotic experiences 
induced by nmda receptor antagonist in healthy volunteers. 
Journal of Psychiatry. v.32.
       
       Vollenweider, F.X., Vontobel, P., Hell, D., and Leenders, 
K.L. (1999). 5-HT modulation of dopamine release in basal 
ganglia in psilocybin-induced psychosis in man. 
Neurophyscopharmacology. v.20.






Part of the Neuron Affected, Inhibitory or Excitatory Potential 
Changes and Ion Channels Affected by Psilocybin By: Michelle 
Richards

Psilocybin belongs to the classification of drugs called 
hallucinogens. Hallucinogens typically act by stimulating 
serotonin receptors at different times or for longer durations 
than serotonin itself would (Kalat 2004). When psilocybin enters 
the brain, the enzyme alkaline breaks down one of its phosphate 
groups through hydrolysis. It then becomes psilocin, an even 
stronger hallucinogen (Psilocybin 2003). It is particularly 
potent due to the position of its hydroxyl group (Jacobs 1984). 
Psilocin is a postsynaptic serotonin receptor agonist. In other 
words, its similar structure allows it to mimic serotonin, 
fitting into some types of serotonin receptors and producing the 
same effect as endogenous serotonin (Merriam Webster 2003). 
Specifically, psilocin activates the 5HT2A and 5HT1A receptors. 
Stimulation of 5HT1 receptors is associated with an inhibitory 
response while stimulation of the 5HT2 receptors is associated 
with an excitatory response. Soma of the serotonergic neurons 
are located in the midline raphe nuclei of the pons and in the 
medulla oblongata. Axons extend to the basal ganglia, 
hypothalamus, limbic forebrain, parts of the cerebral cortex, 
and to the spinal cord (Kruk and Pycock 1979). Functions 
believed to be moderated by serotonin include sleep, mood, 
arousal, control of motor activity, hunger, thermoregulation, 
and some neuroendocrine control mechanisms in the hypothalamus. 
(Powell 2004, Kruk and Pycock 1979).

One theory states that effects caused by psilocin result from 
stimulation of receptors in the raphe nuclei. According to this 
theory, the raphe system has two main functions. One is related 
to stimulation of motor neurons when a person is awake. The 
other is to suppress sensory systems during the waking state 
(Powell 2004). When psilocin binds to the 5HT2A receptors, it 
inhibits the uptake of serotonin, thereby decreasing inhibitory 
serotonin activity. This results in an increase of alertness and 
arousal. Another theory asserts that the important activity of 
psilocin takes place at the proximal dendrites of level V 
pyramidal cells, as this is the area of the brain with the 
highest concentration of 5HT2A receptors. In support of this 
theory, this is the only area of the brain where directly 
applies serotonin excites cells. The receptors do not activate 
pyramidal cells directly but through action potential. This is 
demonstrated by the fact that drugs that stop the action 
potential prevent the 5HT2A induced excitation. While action 
potential is required for such excitation, stimulation of the 
5HT2A receptors does not result in increased action potential. 
The excitation mechanism can also be blocked by presynaptic 
inhibitors, showing that activity in the presynaptic 5HT2A 
receptors that connect with pyramidal cells is also crucial 
(Connely 2004). According to Marek and Aghajanian 1998, page 
1123, "An enhancement of asynchronous evoked [excitatory 
postsynaptic potentials] via 5HT2A receptors provides a possible 
synaptic mechanism for the hallucinogenic effects of these 
drugs."

Psilocybin is an indoleamine, in the same chemical group with 
serotonin and tryptamine. According to the 2003 Merriam Webster 
Medical Dictionary, an indoleamine is "any of various indole 
derivatives that contain an amine group." Typically, 
indoleamines have an affinity for dopamine receptors. A classic 
example is LSD, whose chemical structure is very similar to 
psilocybin. Psilocybin does not. Yet, a research team in 
Switzerland conducting a series of experiments with psilocybin 
noticed that pretreatment with a dopamine antagonist reduces 
some symptoms of psilocybin psychosis (Vollenweider 1998). So, 
some effects of psilocybin may not result from direct 
stimulation of serotonin receptors, but instead in response to 
dopaminergic transmission. To explore the relationship between 
psilocybin and dopamine, the team conducted a study using 
positron emission tomography and a selective radioligand to 
measure dopamine receptor activity in the striatal neurons of 
subjects before and after they had received a dose of 
psilocybin. The radioligand attempts to bind to the same 
receptors in the striatal neurons as endogenous dopamine. 
Measures before and after administration of psilocybin showed a 
decrease in the binding potential of the radioligand. This 
suggests that the receptors were occupied by an increased 
concentration of endogenous dopamine (Vollenweider 1998). It is 
still unclear how psilocybin stimulates a release of dopamine. 
This is especially complicated by the fact that other 5HT2 
antagonists have been shown to increase striatal dopamine 
release, but stimulation of the receptors has not. However, 
5HT1A agonists sometimes increase dopamine release, so it may be 
a result of the combined stimulation (Vollenweider 1998). 

Stimulation of 5HT2A receptors is connected with stimulation of 
phospholipase C, an enzyme that hydrolyzes lecithin. When the 
enzyme is stimulated, it hydrolyzes phosphatidylinositol. The 
resulting compounds are inositol and diacylglycerol. Inositol 
regulates the release of calcium and diacylglycerol aids in 
activation of protein kinase C (Rabin, Regina, and Doat 2001). 
It has been suggested that this connection to the production of 
calcium may increase the potential for asynchronous synaptic 
transmission (Connely 2004). Most synaptic transmission is 
synchronous, meaning that when the action potential reaches the 
presynaptic terminal, the influx of calcium ions leads to the 
release of many synaptic transmitters. In asynchronous 
transmission, there is a low level release of transmitters for 
up to a second after synchronous release (Connely 2004). 
Asynchronous release is sustained by residual calcium ions 
remaining in the terminal after the initial influx (Marek and 
Aghajanian 1998). Marek and Aghajanian found that psilocybin 
promotes the asynchronous release of glutamate onto layer V 
pyramidal cells and increases regional cerebral glucose 
metabolism (Marek and Aghajanian 1998). When hallucinogens are 
present at pyramidal cells, asynchronous transmission increases 
from a rare occurrence that is practically unrecordable to a 
common occurrence that is highly recordable. Synchronous 
transmission in pyramidal cells can be blocked by replacing the 
calcium ions in the synapse with strontium ions. Asynchronous 
transmission cannot be blocked this way, and when a pyramidal 
cell is under the influence of a hallucinogen the excitatory 
potentials it receives also cannot be blocked. This may be due 
to the increased calcium release that takes place in connection 
with stimulation of 5HT2A receptors (Connely 2004).

Stimulation of serotonin receptors has varying effects on action 
potential. Studies using rat brains showed that stimulation of 
5HT2A receptors induces inhibitory postsynaptic potentials in 
layer II pyramidal cells by exciting GABAergic interneurons 
while the majority of potentials produced in layer V pyramidal 
cells are excitatory postsynaptic potentials. Findings also 
indicate that stimulation of these receptors primarily increases 
frequency rather than amplitude of excitatory postsynaptic 
currents. Apical dendrites of the pyramidal cells are much more 
sensitive than basilar dendrites to such stimulation. 

Psilocybin is also called 4 phospho DMT and another name for 
psilocin is 4 hydroxy N, N dimethyltryptamine. Psilocybin is 
part of a group of ring substituted N,N Dialkyl derivatives. 
Member of this group of chemical compounds have an alkyl 
substituent on the aromatic nucleus. Serotonin is unable to 
cross the blood brain barrier due to its ring hydroxyl group 
(Osborne 1982). The difference in psilocybin's hydroxyl group 
allows it to penetrate the blood brain barrier. This is why 
ingesting psilocybin results in activation of cerebral serotonin 
receptors, while systemically injecting serotonin does not. 
Psilocybin is the phosphate esther of psilocin. Differences in 
psilocin's structure make it somewhat more potent than 
psilocybin (Jacobs 1984).

The neurological effects of psilocybin are not yet fully 
understood. Many research projects are currently underway. In 
one recent study, researchers discovered increased plasma 
concentrations of adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol 
during peak effects of psilocybin. This suggests that 5HT2A 
receptor stimulation activates the hypothalamo pituitary adrenal 
axis (Hasler, Grimberg, and Vollenweider 2003). Another recent 
study suggests that psilocybin induces visual distortions via 
5HT2A receptor activation (Carter, et. al. 2004). Although it is 
clear that most effects of psilocybin are caused by stimulation 
of the 5HT2A receptor site, the relationship between the 
activation, the resulting biochemical changes, and perceived 
effects on those who experience hallucinations from psilocybin 
are for the most part unknown. 


References

Carter, Olivia L., Pettigrew, John D., Burr, David C., Alais, 
David, Hasler, Felix and Vollenweider, Franz X. (2004) 
Psilocybin impairs high-level but not low-level motion 
perception. NeuroReport, Volume 15, Number 12. 26 August 2004. 
(pp 1947-1951) Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Connely, Bill. (2004) Neuropharmacology of Hallucinogens: A 
brief introduction. 
http://www.erowid.org/psychoactives/pharmacology/pharmacology_ar
ticle1.shtml

Hasler, F., Grimberg, M.A. Benz, and Vollenweider, F.X. (2003) 
Effects of 2A Receptor Challenge by Psilocybin on Cognitive 
Performance and Neuroendocrine Measures in Healthy Humans: A 
serotonin model of psychosis. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 
Volume 13, Supplement 4. October 2003. (p S450)

Jacobs, Barry L. (1984) Hallucinogens: Neurochemical, 
Behavioral, and Clinical Perspectives. New York, New York: Raven 
Press.

Kalat, James W. (2004) Biological Psychology, 8th ed. Canada: 
Wadsworth.

Kruk, Zygmunt L. and Pycock, Christopher J. (1979) 
Neurotransmitters and Drugs. Baltimore, Maryland: University 
Park Press.

Marek, Gerard J. and Aghajanian, George K. (1998) The 
Electrophysiology of Prefrontal Serotonin Systems: Therapeutic 
Implications for Mood and Psychosis. Biological Psychiatry. (pp 
1118-1127) From the Department of Psychiatry and Department of 
Pharmacology, Yale School of Medicine, Connecticut Mental Health 
Center, New Haven, Connecticut.

Merriam-Webster Medical Dictionary online at MedlinePlus. 
Updated 04 February 2003. 
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/mplusdictionary.html 
Bethesda, Maryland: U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Newman, P.P., M.D. (1980) Neurophysiology. Jamaica, N.Y.: 
Spectrum Publications.

Osborne, Neville N. (1982) Biology of Serotonergic Transmission. 
New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Powell, Simon G. (2004) The Psilocybin Solution: Prelude to a 
Paradigm Shift.

Psilocybin: Reciprocal Net Common Molecule. (2003) Reciprocal 
Net Site Network. 
http://www.reciprocalnet.org/recipnet/showsample.jsp?sampleId=27
344568

Rabin, Richard A., Regina, Meridith, and Doat, Mirielle J.C. 5-
HT2A Receptor-stimulated Phosphoinositide Hydrolysis in the 
Stimulus Effects of Hallucinogens. (2001) Pharmacology, 
Biochemistry and Behavior. Volume 72, 2002. (pp 29-37) 
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medicine 
and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at 
Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.

Vollenweider, Franz X, M.D., Vontobel, Peter, PhD., Hell, 
Daniel, M.D., and Leenders, Klaus, M.D. (1998) 5HT Modulation of 
Dopamine Release in Basal Ganglia in Psilocybin Induced 
Psychosis in Man: A PET Study with [11C]raclopride. 
Neuropsychopharmacology 1999, Volume 20, Number 5. (pp 424-431) 
New York, New York: Elsevier Science Inc.






PHYSIOLOGICAL (WHOLE BODY) CHANGES and
PRIMARY BEHAVIOR CHANGES
SHAWNEE O. THAYER

Physiological (Whole Body) Changes
       Psilocybin, the active psychotomimetic, hallucinogenic 
chemical found in the psilocybe genus of mushrooms, is absorbed 
through the mouth and stomach and is a monoamine-related 
substance (Levitt 1975, Grilly, 1998). This means that 
psilocybin's biochemical effects are mediated by changes in the 
activity of serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine in the 
central nervous system (made up of the brain and the spinal 
cord) primarily by way of 5HT2a receptors (Grilly 1998, Hasler 
2003).  Monoamine-related drugs share a basic similarity in 
molecular structure with monoamine neurotransmitters serotonin, 
dopamine, and norepinephrine.  Psilocybin produces bodily 
changes which are mostly sympathomimetic.  This means that 
psilocybin mimics the effects of stimulating postganglionic 
adrenergic sympathetic nerves (online medical).  The effects of 
this sympathetic nervous system arousal may consist of pupillary 
dilation, increases in blood pressure and heart rate, 
exaggeration of deep tendon reflexes, tremor, nausea, 
piloerection (hair erection), and increased body temperature 
(Grilly 1998). 
       Psilocybin creates distinct psychological (hallucinogenic, 
entheogenic) changes in humans.  Because of the mind-altering 
properties of the drug, much research on psilocybin is devoted 
to understanding its physiological effects on brain chemistry.  
       A recent study tested prefrontal activation during a 
cognitive challenge and the neurometabolic effects of four 
different drugs on 113 regions of interest of the brain 
(Gouzoulis 1999).  The four substances tested were psilocybin, 
d-methamphetamine (METH), methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDE), 
and a placebo in healthy volunteers.  No significant differences 
of global cerebral metabolism were found in the four groups. 
Neurometabolic effects were found to include a significant 
increase of regional glucose activity in the right anterior 
cingulate of the brain, the right frontal operculum, and an 
increase in activity of the right inferior temporal region.  A 
significant decrease in metabolism was found in the right 
thalamus, the left precentral region and a decrease in activity 
was found in the left thalamus.  Overall there was a general 
hypermetabolism of the prefrontal region of the right hemisphere 
and hypometabolism in subcortical regions.  During the cognitive 
challenge activation of the middle prefrontal cortex was 
eliminated and activation of Broca's area (right frontal 
operculum) was reduced. 
       In a study conducted by A.M. Quetin, electrolyte levels, 
liver toxicity tests and blood sugar levels were shown to be 
unaffected by psilocybin (Passie 2002).  White blood cells 
temporarily decreased in number between the second and forth 
hour after ingestion.
       A study directed by F. Hasler studied the dose-dependent 
physiological effects of psilocybin in healthy volunteers 
(Hasler 2003).  Four doses were administered to the 
participants: a placebo (PL), 45 ('very low dose' VLD) mg/kg 
body weight, 115 ('low dose' LD) mg/kg body weight, 215 ('medium 
dose' MD) mg/kg body weight, and 315 ('high dose' HD) mg/kg body 
weight.  No significant elevation in blood pressure was noted, 
although in the HD condition a short-lasting moderate rise in 
blood pressure did occur one hour into the experiment.  It was 
concluded that no cardiovascular complications should be 
expected from ingestion of psilocybin in healthy humans without 
pre-existing medical conditions.  A significant increase of the 
levels of analyzed hormones thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), 
prolactin (PRL), cortisol (CORT), and adrenocorticotropic 
hormone (ACTH) were found during the peak effect (105 minutes) 
of HD psilocybin, and by 300 minutes all hormones were back to 
baseline.  HD psilocybin also led to a short-term statistically 
significant but clinically irrelevant increase on two liver 
enzymes: gamma glutamyltransferase (GGT), and aspartate 
aminotransferase (ASAT).  These levels never rose out of normal 
physiological range.  
       A study by F. Vollenweider looked at the effects of 
psilocybin on brain activation patterns of healthy individuals 
and the similarities its effects has to the effects of naturally 
occurring psychosis on brain activation patterns (Vollenweider 
2001).  The 'psychotomimetic' effects of psilocybin are produced 
through the excessive 5HT2A receptor activation. There is a 
activation of the prefrontal cortex and overlapping changes in 
cortical, straital, and thalamic regions of the brain.  
Psilocybin disrupts the thalamo-cortical gate of external and 
internal information to the cortex.  This gating deficit is 
thought to result in sensory overload with excessive processing 
of external and internal stimuli, which leads to the person's 
inability to screen out, filter, or gate these stimuli.  This 
can lead to cognitive fragmentation or breakdown of cognitive 
integrity, and difficulty in distinguishing self from non-self. 
Information was found to support but not conclusively prove this 
effect of psilocybin on the brain. 
       Overall physiological effects are pupillary dilation, 
slight increase in blood pressure and an increase in heart rate, 
exaggeration of deep tendon reflexes, tremor, nausea, hair 
erection, and increased body temperature.  These changes are 
largely due to sympathetic nervous system arousal (Grilly 1998).  
There is stimulation of 5HT (5HT2, 5HT1) receptorswhich leads to 
an increase in straital dopamine effects which are thought to 
contribute to the psychomimetic effects of psilocybin 
(Vollenweider 1999).  Hypermetabolism was noted in distinct 
frontal cortical areas of the right hemisphere, although during 
a frontal activation task (specific cognitive demand) the 
ability to increase metabolism in these areas was impaired, 
contributing to the participants decreased reaction time and 
inability to concentrate or focus on the task (Gouzoulis 1999).  
Psilocybin-induced metabolic hyperfrontality and metabolic 
alterations in the left temporal lobe, the occipital cortex, and 
basal ganglia relate to hallucinations and ego disintegration 
(Vollenweider 1997).  Psilocybin disturbs cortico-striato-
thalamic pathways (Vollenweider 2001).  The disruption of 
thalamo-cortical gating of external and internal sensory 
information to the cortex is thought to result in an overload of 
stimulus information (internal and external).  The result is 
cognitive fragmentation (loss of identity, ego confusion).  
Psilocybin exhibits low toxicity and is not found to be 
hazardous to the somatic health of health participants (Hasler 
2004, Passie 2002).

Primary Behavior Changes
	The primary behavior changes experienced by ingestion of 
psilocybin are largely psychological in nature.  There are 
individual changes in psycholo(patho)logical core dimentions, 
mood, and attention (Hasler 2004).  These changes are also 
subjective, varying from person to person.  Psilocybin also 
causes hallucinations, which is why it is referred to as 
psychotomimetic, although the type of hallucinations and 
distortion of reality induced by psilocybin does not actually 
mimic the type of psychosis found in schizophrenic and manic 
humans (Grilly 1998).
       A recent study tested the dose-dependent physiological and 
psychological effects of psilocybin (Hasler 2004).  Doses were 
administered adjusted to the participant's body weight.  The 
subjects were given either the placebo (PL), 45 mg/kg ("very low 
dose" VLD), 115 mg/kg ("low dose" LD), 215 mg/kg ("medium dose" 
MD), or 315 mg/kg ("high dose" HD).  Psychological changes were 
measured by the "Altered States of Consciousness Rating Scale" 
(5D-ASC), the "Frankfurt Attention Inventory" (FAIR), and the 
"Adjective Mood Rating Scale" (AMRS).  Psilocybin dose-
dependently induced alterations of affect, ego-functions, 
perception and attention in all subjects.  Doses of MD and HD 
psilocybin led to a loosening of ego boundaries (derealization, 
depersonalization phenomena associated with positive emotional 
states such as heightened mood to euphoria, also includes 
anxious ego dissolution associated with dysphoric mood states 
caused by ego-disintegration and loss of self-control).  MD, HD 
psilocybin also caused pronounced changes in perception 
(elementary hallucinations, synesthesia ("soundseeing" or 
"colorhearing", etc.), changed meaning of percept, facilitated 
recollection, and facilitated imagination).  One participant (HD 
psilocybin) experienced pronounced anxiety caused by the 
disturbance of ego functioning, while all other participants 
reported a loosening of boundaries between self and environment 
which was accompanied by insight and experienced by the 
participant as "unifying with a higher reality".  Only MD and HD 
psilocybin led to intervals of geometric and complex visual 
hallucinations.  VLD, LD psilocybin induced illusions 
(intensification or distortion of visual perception).  
Psilocybin altered or amplified acoustic perception.  General 
inactivation (inactivation, drowsiness, tiredness), introversion 
and dreaminess were robust in all subjects.  Following HD 
psilocybin, "dreaminess" was still present 24 hours after all 
other effects had worn off.  VLD and LD of psilocybin led to 
mental states in which normal waking consciousness was 
intermittently pervaded by short-lived drug states, the 
"insightfulness" of higher doses of psilocybin being absent.  
The subjects were administered different doses on subsequent 
days, and they were unable to clearly state in retrospect which 
day they had received which dose, suggesting that all doses of 
psilocybin share subjective "qualities". 
	Another study tested the effects of psilocybin on D2-
dopamine receptors in healthy volunteers (Vollenweider 1999).  
It concluded that psilocybin produces a psychotic syndrome that 
included difficulties in reality appraisal and thinking, 
disturbances of sensory perception and emotion, and impairment 
of ego-functioning (loss of ego-boundaries).  During the peak 
period of psilocybin affects the participants' experienced 
auditory and visual disturbances (illusions to complex scenery 
hallucinations).  Derealization and loosening of ego-boundaries 
was experienced, and participants reported feelings of 
heightened mood, euphoria, and feelings of grandiosity, and 
three participants reacted with anxiety.  Participants 
experienced difficulties in concentrating and attention.  The 
content of thinking was often influenced by derealization, and 
was accelerated or slowed down.
	  Overall behavior changes induced by psilocybin are 
largely psychological in nature.  They include affective 
changes, disturbances in thinking, illusions, elementary and 
complex hallucinations, and alterations in ego-functioning 
(Vollenweider 1999).  Also noted are changes in attention 
(Hasler 2004).  Due to set (the mental stability and 
psychoemotional state of the person) and setting (the 
environment), and the highly subjective nature of psilocybins 
effects, a person's experience can be pleasant, or delightful, 
and include a deep sense of connection with others and a general 
sense of connection with nature and the universe, or can lead to 
deep-seated emotional conflicts, and result in temporary 
disconnection from reality (Perrine 1996).  


References
Gouzoulis Mayfrank E, Schreckenberger M, Sabri O, Arning C, 
Thelen B, Spitzer M, Kovar K, Hermle L, Bull U, Sass H 
(1999): Neurometabolic effects of psilocybin, 3,4-
methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDE) and d-methamphetamine 
in healthy volunteers; a double-blind, placebo controlled 
PET study with [18F]FDG. Neuropschopharmacology 20:565-581

Grilly, David M. Drugs and Human Behavior. (1998) 3rd ed; 
       Allyn and Bacon, Boston 

Hasler F, Grimberg U, Benz M A, Huber T, Vollenweider F (2004): 
Acute psychological and physiological effects of psilocybin 
in healthy humans: a double blind placebo controlled dose-
effect study. Psychopharmacology 172:145-156

Levitt, Robert A. (1975). Psychopharmacology: a biological 
approach. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, NW 
Washington DC

Passie T, Seifert J, Schneider U, Emrick H (2002): The 
       Pharmacology of psilocybin. Addiction Biology 
       7:357-364

Perrine, Daniel M. (1996). The Chemistry of Mind-Altering 
Drugs: history, pharmacology, and cultural context. 
American Chemical Society, Wash DC

Vollenweider F, Leenders K, Scharfetter C, Maguire P, 
Stadlemann O, Angst J (1997): Positron emission tomography 
and florodeoxyglucose studies of metabolic hyperfrontality 
and psychopathology in the psilocybin model of psychosis. 
Neuropsychopharmacology 16:357-372

Vollenweider F, Vontobel P, Hell D, Leenders K (1999) 5-HT 
modulation of dopamine release in basal ganglia in 
psilocybin induced psychosis in man: a PET study with 
["C]raclopride. Neuropsychopharmacology 20:424-433

Vollenweider F, Geyer M (2001): A systems model of altered 
consciousness: integrating natural and drug-induced 
psychosis. Brain Research Bulletin 56:495-507 






Side Effect Behavior Changes and Effects Reported by Users of 
the drug Psilocybin
By: Holly Young

       There have been many experiments and personal testimonies 
documenting the side effect behavior changes and effects 
reported by users of the drug Psilocybin from ancient history 
until more modern times. For instance, the Aztecs believed that 
they were capable of moving back and forth between the earthly 
and supernatural realms (Schwartz 1988). This travel between 
realms was often associated with hallucinatory trances guided by 
their god for the entheogens-the Prince of Flowers. The Aztecs 
called this ritual "the flowery dream;" this was induced by 
sacred mushrooms (Erowid). The trend towards experimenting with 
Psilocybin to determine its effects on the body started in the 
early 1960's with prominent psychologists like Timothy Leary and 
Albert Hofmann taking Psilocybin themselves and reporting their 
experiences (Levitt 1975: 270). Later, there were more 
controlled double-blind studies performed with groups of 
subjects where the drug is administered and neither the subjects 
nor the experimenter know which group is receiving the drug and 
which group is receiving the placebo. It is much easier in these 
types of experiments to control for extraneous variables and to 
find a good operational measure for the subjects' reactions to 
Psilocybin. However, since the experiences reported by most 
users of Psilocybin are within a narrow radius of variation, it 
is possible to utilize individual's personal experiences of 
Psilocybin as long as they are comparable to the experiences 
reported by the majority of the Psilocybin users in other 
experiments.							
       In general, both psilocybin and psilocybin produce yawning, 
inability to concentrate, restlessness, increased heart rate, 
and hallucinations (visual and auditory). These symptoms may 
appear 30 to 60 minutes after the mushroom is eaten and can last 
about four hours (Kuhn 1998). According to one online source, 
there is a effect-time curve documenting the general reaction to 
Psilocybin (see Appendix 1). The total duration of the reaction 
is about 4-7 hours when the Psilocybin is ingested orally, but 
the experience is divided into four stages: Onset, lasting from 
15-60 minutes, Coming Up, lasting from 15-30 minutes, Plateau, 
lasting from 2-4 hours, and Coming Down, lasting from 1-3 hours 
(Schwartz 1988). In addition to these four general stages, there 
are three different levels of effects. The mildest are the 
Threshold Effects (from .25 gm to .75 gms of Psilcybe), which 
are characterized by a slight cold feeling, mild gas or nausea, 
nervous-feeling, pupil dilation, mild visual changes including 
lights seeming brighter, and noticing movement at the periphery 
of vision, giddiness, more emotional sensitivity, and other 
effects related to a change in neurochemistry (Erowid, Schwartz 
1988). 		
       The next level, termed Medium Effects (from .75 gm to 2.5 
gms of Psilocybe) are characterized by a cold feeling, 
gastrointestinal discomfort, pupil-dilation, open-eye visual 
effects, such as auras around lights, and rainbowing around 
lighting, noticing movement around the visual periphery, 
increased or decreased ability to focus, closed eye visuals with 
an increased ability to visualize creatively spontaneous 
detailed images, feelings of time-dilation, feelings of 
belonging and connection, increased emotional sensitivity, 
realizations of past feelings, realizations about how to live, 
gain a new perspective on current lifestyle and behavior, 
feelings of wonder, spirit, joy, sadness, despair, religious 
awakening, contentment and possibly latent psychological 
crisises come out (Erowid, Schwartz 1988). The most intense 
level, termed the High Dose Effects (from 2.5 gms to 10 gms of 
Psilocybin), include all of the Medium effects, usually with a 
significantly more uncomfortable Coming Up, including pronounced 
nausea, sometimes significant cognitive discomfort associated 
with feelings of fear, and characterized by elaborate closed eye 
visualizations, religious revelation, spiritual awakening, near 
death experiences, loss of self, talking to seemingly external, 
autonomous entities, extreme emotional responses, repressed 
memories coming to life, latent psychological crises coming to 
the surface, an increase in artistic sense and intense feelings 
of wonder, connection, joy, fear. High Dose Effects could also 
include extreme time-dilation (Erowid, Schwartz 1988).			
	
       One psychologist, Robert S. Gable, a professor of 
psychology at Claremont Graduate School in Claremont, 
California, wrote about his own personal experience with 
Psilocybin. When he was at graduate school in the 1960's, he 
took 4 mg of Psilocybin one day and reported his experience as 
seeing "kaleidoscopic neon-glowing webs undulating in an inky 
irridescent plasma" (Gable 1993: 43). He also wrote observer's 
impressions of him being 'agitated,' at the same time as he 
himself reports being involved in "kinesthetic exploration" for 
the fun of it, like a child would (Gable 1993: 43). He 
philosophied that a better, deeper symbolic medium would be a 
kinesthetic language. After describing this experience to 
Abraham Maslow, Maslow described it as a "peak experience" 
(Gable 1993: 44). A peak experience, according to Maslow, is a 
nonreligious, quasi-mystical, and/or mystical experience (Guiley 
1991: 438). Peak experiences are sudden feelings of intense 
happiness and well-being, and possibly the awareness of 
"ultimate truth" and the unity of all things (1991: 438). 
Accompanying these experiences is a heightened sense of control 
over the body and emotions, and a wider sense of awareness, as 
though one was standing upon a mountaintop (1991: 438). The 
experience fills the individual with wonder and awe. He feels at 
one with the world and is pleased with it; he or she has seen 
the ultimate truth or the essence of all things (1991:438). This 
definition of a peak experience fits most generally the 
description study participants give after having injested 
Psilocybin. 				
       Another couple of interesting, interrelated experiments 
have to do with participants who hear audible voices at high 
doses of psilocybin by Horace Beach and Terrence McKenna. states 
that a third of participants who used psilocybin mushrooms 
reported a perceived voice (Beach 1997). This study claims that 
"mushrooms can catalyze an auditory dialogue between the one who 
ingests them and a voice of unknown origin" (Beach 1997). The 
sample in the Beach study consisted of 128 participants, ninty-
nine males and twenty-nine females ranging in age from 18 to 75 
(M = 40.72, SD = 12.86) (Beach 1997). Of the total questionnaire 
responses, 35.9% (n =46) of the participants reported having 
head a voice(s) with psilocybin use, while 64% (n+ 82) of the 
participants stated that they had not heard a voice (Beach 
1997). The group that reported having heard a voice(s) with 
psilocybin use, on average, took the mushroom more times, took a 
larger amount of dried grams of mushrooms per use, and took the 
mushroom more often in darkness that the No group (the group 
that reported hearing no voices (1997). The Yes group also used 
psilocybin and then tried to evoke a voice(s) more times that 
the No group did (1997). Also the Yes group reported taking 
psilocybin more often while alone than the NO group; as 
suggested by T. McKenna, by being alone talking is elminated as 
a distraction (McKenna 1991, 1993). The second statistically 
significant difference between the groups was the finding that 
the Yes group endorsed having heard a voice(s) when using drugs 
other than psilocybin significantly more often than did the No 
group. (Beach 1997). 						The 
participants rarely reported having heard more than a single 
voice during an experience (1997). Additionally, the voice 
experience could not be maintained for long periods of time 
(more than 19 minutes) (1997). Though evidently a subtle 
phenomenon, the voice(s) is reported most of the time as "clear-
sounding and sensible;" the voices also sounded old, male, and 
"low-pitched, slow paced and of low volume" (1997). In a little 
less than half of reported experiences, participants stated that 
t voices expressed emotion; compassion, anger, love, calm, 
humor, fear and sadness (1997). Under half of the reported 
experiences, participants said that voice came from outside of 
their heads; and a majority of participants also stated that the 
voice(s) was not familiar when they first heard it with 
psilocybin (1997). Also, in just under half of reported 
experiences, participants said that the voice spoke in first 
person (1997). An interesting finding of this study is that in 
over 45% of participants' total experiences with a voice(s) and 
psilocybin, sounds other than voices were present, such as "high 
pitch, high tone, humming, buzzing, whirring, ringing, rustling, 
rushing, water, howling, vibrations, whooshing, crinkling, 
insect-like, drumming, whirling-circular" (1997). These reports 
are similar to observations made by T. McKenna and D McKenna 
(1993), and Weil (1980). Beach concludes that "the Logos may 
superimpose itself on and utilize the formless white-noise of 
internal or external stimuli to create a voice(s), and then, 
entering the individual's faculty of audition, speaks"; "meaning 
(or form) is superimposed on the formless" (1997). 			
			
       In another experiment titled, "The effects of THC and 
Psilocybin on Paranormal Phenomena," by R. Wezelman et al., the 
researchers wanted to explore the effect of Psilocybin on ESP in 
the Ganzfeld. Here (other) subjects who were experienced with 
the use of halucinoids took a standard dose of Psilocybin in 
Mexican mushrooms about half an hour before the session 
(Wezelman 1997). Because of the exploratory nature, this part of 
the experiment was not set up as a within subject design and 
hence did not allow for valid evaluation of the effect of 
Psilocybin. Also the experimenters introduced a new feature in 
the procedure, namely rather than testing one person at a time 
they tested two simultaneously (Wezelman 1997).  This was done 
to enhance the feelings of cohesion in the group and was part of 
a series of measures taken to prevent potential bad trips. 
During each session the experimenter could, if the situation 
would demand this, contact the psychiatric department of the 
nearby hospital. Fortunately, we never had to use this option. 
Only 12 subjects participated only once (tripping) in this study 
so it is impossible to compare their performances with and 
without Psilocybin (1997).  Although this comparison suggests 
that the use of Psilocybin has a dramatic effect on the psi 
scores, the alternative explanation is that the group of 
selected subjects used (namely subjects with trip experience) is 
a very special group with different personality characteristics 
and that they would have scored in the same was when they had 
been in a normal state of consciousness. 		In a 
confirmatory study, twenty subjects participated twice in this 
study (1997). They all had some experience with using mushrooms 
and they were generally recruited from friends of the 
experimentors or from friends from the Institute where the 
experiments took place. Preceding one of the two sessions a 
standard dose Mexican Mushrooms were prepared and taken by the 
subject. After about 30 minutes the subject was introduced into 
the Ganzfeld procedure which lasted about 45 minutes (1997). 
During this time a 'sender' was looking a few times at a 
randomly chosen video clip in another part of the building. At 
the end of the 45 minutes the subject had to do the judging, 
i.e. to select one out of 4 possible video clips as being the 
target for the session that was just finished (1997). After 
having entered this choice into the computer the 'sender' came 
downstairs and told which one of the 4 clips was the actual 
target (1997). After this the subject was left alone for about 
another hour with music of his/her choice in order to get over 
the most intense part of the trip. Subjects stayed at the 
institute until they felt comfortable enough to return home. The 
results were quite disappointing because the over-all scoring 
rate in the tripping condition was exactly what could be 
expected by chance. I.e. the tripping subjects did select the 
correct target only once in every 4 sessions. In the control 
condition the subjects did even worse but the difference was not 
statistically significant. 	When discussing these findings 
with some of the subjects it was mentioned that they had not 
felt at ease during the experiment. This was to be expected 
because the experiment was much more formal than the pilot 
study. One felt basically alone. It was noted that in that 
context experienced trippers probably would suppress negative 
feelings that were coming up. Half of the target clips were 
rather negative, for instance a fragment of a crashing airplane. 
The remaining clips were positive, for instance the beautiful 
images of a horse breaking free from a group of horses. When 
breaking down the results for the two categories the researchers 
found that results that at first sight looked disappointing were 
actually quite fascinating. It turns out that for positive clips 
the effect of psilocybin  is positive with a scoring rate close 
to the one found in the pilot study (1997). However, this effect 
is completely annihilated by the effect of psilocybin in 
sessions with negative clips as targets. There they saw that the 
subjects seem to 'avoid' to get impressions about the negative 
clips when tripping. It seems as if they try to avoid to drift 
into a bad trip. The effect is completely the opposite when the 
subjects are in their 'normal' state of consciousness. The 
latter could be explained by the evolutionary value of getting 
psi-impressions of negative events.	Even though a single 
experiment with a limited number of subjects can never give rise 
to strong conclusions because the statistical power is too low, 
the findings reported here seem to suggest that: Psi performance 
is affected by the use of psychoactive drugs and that Psilocybin 
increases scoring rates if the material is positive but it might 
decrease scoring rates when the material is negative (1997). 
This conclusion could be dependent on the context. If the 
context is very pleasant and subjects feel they can allow 
themselves to experience negative feelings, also negative clips 
might show a positive rather than a negative effect. Although it 
is common to confine experimental research reports to the 
'numbers' we would like to add two qualitative observations. In 
the second part of the study the judges were explicitly required 
to be in a normal state. It turned out that this judging effect 
then disappeared. Similarly, we found that in spite of the high 
scoring rate in the pilot phase of the Psilocybin study the 
impressions of the subjects were not clearly associated with the 
target. In fact, tripping persons do report so many images that 
there are correspondences with each target in the target-set and 
choosing from them becomes quite difficult (1997). When asked, 
the subjects said they 'felt in their stomach' which target was 
the real target. Both observations suggest that further research 
should focus on the effect of the drugs not only in the phase 
where the impressions are supposed to 'come in' but also in the 
judging phase where the final choice has to be made.                                                                                                                            
 
References

Beach, Horace. (1997). Listening for the Logos: a study of 
reports of audible voices at high doses of psilocybin. 
Newsletter of the Multidisciplinary Association for 
Psychedelic Studies (MAPS) Volume 7 Number 1 pp. 12-17.
Guiley, Rosemary Ellen. Harper's Encyclopedia of Mystical and 
Paranormal Experience. 
New York: HarperCollins, 1991 438-439
Kuhn, C., Swartzwelder, S. and Wilson, W. (1998). Buzzed. The 
Straight Facts About The Most Used And Abused Drugs From 
Alcohol To Ecstasy. New York: W.W. Norton and Company. 
Levitt, R.A. (1975). Psychopharmacology: a biological approach. 
Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
McKenna, T. (1991). The archaic revival. San Francisco: Harper 
       San Francisco. 
McKenna, T., & McKenna, D. (1999). The invisible landscape: 
Mind, hallucinogens, and the I Ching. San Francisco: Harper 
San Francisco. 
Schwartz, Richart H. and Smith, Deborah. Hallucinogenic 
Mushrooms. 				
	Clinical Pediatrics 27. 70-73 (1988). 
The Vault of Erowid: Sacred mushrooms. Retrieved from 
       www.erowid.org/plants/mushrooms. (21 February 2005).
Weil, A. (1980). The marriage of the sun and moon: A quest for 
unity in consciousness. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Wezelman, R. & Bierman, D.J. (1997). Process Oriented Ganzfeld 
Research in Amsterdam: The effects of THC and Psilocybin on 
paranormal phenomena. Retrieved from 
http://m0134.fmg.uva.nl/publications/2000/psychotropic_GF.p
df (28 February 2005).


Go back to the beginning

Copyright © 2005, Dr. John M. Morgan, All rights reserved - This page last edited 1-3, 2005
If you have any feedback for the author, E-mail me

Home page of Humboldt State Univ. Home 
page of College of Natural Resources and Science Home 
page of Psychology Dept, HSU Home page of Dr. John M. Morgan