Biofeedback EEG Peak Performance By Michael Hale The body is an amazing system with much complexities and a special potential for improving within its self. Biofeedback is a means for such improvement. Biofeedback measures certain state(s) of the body to a practitioner or patient. This information is used as status in reaching a particular goal. Most of the goals are alleviating dysfunctions and/or disorders. However, there does not need to be dysfunctions or disorders to begin improvement of mind and body. This notion of improvement in terms of biofeedback is called peak performance, also known as peak achievement and performance enhancement. Using peak performance optimally may result in better performance in certain areas. These areas vary from education, to sports, to work. The mode of biofeedback used in peak performance is determined by such goals. The main modes of biofeedback are the Electromyography machine and the Electroencephalographic machine. This paper focuses on the Electroencephalographic machine. This mode of biofeedback is related to the brain. This biofeedback is a measurement of electrical brain activity. Activity such as frequency, amplitude, and the duration of activity of theta waves alpha waves or beta waves from certain locations as well as auditory, visual, or somatosensory event related potentials (Biofeedback A Practitioner's guide, Schwartz et. Al.) Brain activity is relevant to all performance. The Electroencephalographic peak performance involves such goals as; increasing focus and attention, decreasing hyperactivity, developing a better memory, sustaining information longer, increasing concentration, improving accuracy, and other applications that involve these. However, peak performance is specific in its modes and uses, a patient can't improve all brain activity aspects. For example, a patient will not be able to increase beta activity in her frontal lobe (to decrease brain deterioration) at the same time as trying to increase theta activity (as a therapeutic strategy to sleep better at night). But, a golfer may be able to increase alpha before hitting his ball (for better concentration). These goals apply, of course, only if Electroencephalographic biofeedback does in fact increase target brain waves. A significant number of studies and experiments show that biofeedback/neurofeedback do increase target waves specified or decrease target waves as specified. Once the patients goal(s) are eventually achieved from the training, they should be able to achieve peak performance from the training without the instruments (Norris, 1986; Petruzzelo and Solazar 1991). Namely, Electroencephalograph peak performance is to effect certain types of brain waves. When training alpha waves, one is training concentration mostly. When training beta waves, one is training activity processing and response. When training theta waves, one is training memory. There is also training to decrease certain waves but this is more disorder and dysfunction related and more complicated as well. "Brain brightening" is a product of Electroencephalographic biofeedback. The term "brain brightening" means basically the increase of brain activity. It is called this because if one were to take a snapshot of the brain activity and the firing synapses and such were the brightening factors then with training the brain could eventually become brighter and brighter with more activity. In a relative experiment done one elerly individuals who suffer from age-associated memory impairment alpha amplitude, peak frequency, and decrease in theta (as targeted) were results of Electroencephalographic neurofeedback training. Subjective reports indicate better memory and better cognitive functioning (Budzynski, university of Washingtion). With Electroencephalographic training ones performance on tasks increase in many ways. Mentally, a tasks requires attention, focus, and thought for usually a certain duration. In an experiment Tobas Egner and John Gruzelier report positive results of Electroencephalographic biofeedback on tasks. 22 college students were trained to adhere to certain 12-15 Hz brain waves. The results show an enhancement in these waves and are correlated to a reduction in errors of a task as well as improved perceptual sensitivity on a continuous performance task. There were also significant increases in event related brain potential amplitudes. Another major aspect of performance is concentration. Hatfield 1984 reports of his experiment with archery marksmen. A group of marksmen were trained to adhere to alpha brain waves. The results show that when the marksmen increased their brain alpha brain waves right before releasing (the most important time for aiming) there was an increase of overall accuracy. As more evidence of peak performance David Vernon and Tobias Egner investigated the possibility that training healthy individuals to enhance certain frequencies would specifically influence a particular aspect of cognitive performance, relative to a non-neurofeedback control-group. The results showed that the trained group was able to selectively increase and decrease certain frequencies while the control group comparitably could not. The point of Electroencephalograph peak performance is to increase or decrease brain waves to better performance. This form of peak performance is applicable to many things since brain waves and patterns and such are relevant to most performances. Bibliography Norris P. 1986 Biofeedback, voluntary control and human potential, Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 11(1) 1-15 Hatfield B. D. 1984 Cognitive Process during self paced motor performance; an electroencephalograph profile of skilled marksmen, Journal of Sports Psychology 6, 42-59 Scwartz Biofeedback A Practitioner's Guide Guilford Press 1995 Budzynski T. 1996, Brain Brightening: Can neurofeedback Improve Cognitive Process, University of Washington Egner,Tobias Gruzelier, 2001, Learned self-regulation of Electroencephalograph frequency components affects attention and event related brain potentials in humans, Neuroport 2001 Dec 12 (18) 4155-4159 Vernor Egner, Tobias, The effect of Training Distinct Neurofeedback protocols on aspects of Cognitive Performance, International Journal of Psychophysiology, Jan 2003, 47 (1) 75-85Return to the Project Table of Contents Go back to the beginning
Copyright © 2003, Dr. John M. Morgan, All rights
reserved -
This page last edited May 13, 2003
If you have any feedback for the author, E-mail me