Basal Ganglion and Motor Deficits
Amy Wallace
Psych. 472
Prof. Morgan
11/15/99
In 1817, a physician and surgeon named James Parkinson published a short
paper entitled, “An Essay on the Shaking Palsy.” Practicing in London, he
was studying six patients who all demonstrated similar symptoms. He
described their characteristics as: “Involuntary tremulous motion, with
lessened muscular power, a propensity to bend the trunk forwards.” Over a
century later, the disease that bares his name affects approximately 0.15% of
the population.(1,2)
Until the latter part of the 18th century, symptoms were seen largely as
entities. Similarities between specific physical and cognitive disabilities
were not usually correlated and categorized as a particular illness. Given
that and the fact that medical science had not yet implemented the
stethoscope or reflex hammer, his observation is quite prodigious. He also
deserves acknowledgment for recognizing patients with different symptoms were
suffering from the same disorder at different stages.
In 1867, a founder of modern neurology named Jean Marie Charcot,
considerably added to the description of Parkinson’s, including muscular
rigidity and various other manifestations. He started treatment with an
alkaloid drug derived from a plant, which remained the only medical treatment
for Parkinson’s Disease until nearly a century later. The origin of the
disease remained enigmatic for many years; some physicians thought the
problem was in the muscles, some in the spinal cord, and some believed it to
be in the brain, but did not know exactly where. Finally, in 1915, a student
named Tretiadoff published a thesis describing a number of changes in the
nerve cells in the substantia nigra, which is a cluster of darkly pigmented
neurons near the brainstem. His ideas were controversial, until a group of
doctors in Sweden discovered nerve pathways that started in the substantia
nigra and spread to the stratium (a group of nerve cells located in each
cerebral hemisphere that is essential to muscular movement.) Using new
technology, the Swedish researchers found that dopamine was present in both
areas of the brain.(1) By 1957, Parkinson’s Disease was understood to be a
state of cerebral dopamine insufficiency.
Dopamine is a chemical that can be made in the body (where it functions
as a hormone) and in the brain (where it functions as a neurotransmitter.) A
neurotransmitter is a chemical that must be present in the synapse between a
neuron’s receiving and transmitting structures, the dendrite and axon, in
order for the electrical impulse to transmit from one area to another. There
is no direct passageway from the brain to the muscles; nerve impulses must
travel through the spinal cord and into the peripheral nervous system (PNS).
The connection between the motor nerve cells in the spinal cord and the PNS
nerve cells is usually not impaired in Parkinson’s victims. The neurons in
the brain and spinal cord would also be able to function except for the
absence of the essential element dopamine.
Neurotransmitters are manufactured in the neurons that send their
signals to receiving cells. That is, the neuron that delivers the impulse
provides the needed neurotransmitter. In Parkinson’s, the greatest
deficiency of dopamine is in the stratium, an important division of the basal
ganglia, which is a group of neurons largely responsible for motor control.
The substantia nigra sends its axons into the stratium. The nerves in the
substantia nigra are darkly pigmented and their primary function is to
produce dopamine. Over the course of the illness, these cells become less
pigmented and die. In the beginning of the disease, the remaining cells work
overtime attempting to make up for the neurons which have already died, but
eventually they reach a point where they cannot produce enough dopamine to
keep the stratium functioning. This leads to disturbances in the ability of
the stratium to operate and results in physical and sometimes mental
disturbances.
The exact purpose of the stratium is not fully understood, yet it is
generally accepted that it sends out and receives messages from almost all
centers in the nervous system. The nigrostriam (the substantia nigra and
stratium represented together) has two main responsibilities. First, it must
coordinate a series of muscular movements required in any action. Second, it
is responsible for maintaining muscular tone. The stratium organizes all
nerve impulses responsible for any movement such as walking, brushing one’s
hair, or playing a musical instrument. Parkinson’s diminishes tone in the
extensor muscles, which are the muscles on the exterior of the body that
control extension and straightening.(3)
This creates a variety of ailments, usually appearing first as a slight
tremor, commonly in the hands. “Pin rolling” is a typical symptom wherein
the patient seems to be rolling a pill between their thumb and index finger.
(Such involuntary tremors increase during relaxation, but subside while the
individual is sleeping or concentrating on a specific task.)(4) Patients also
experience Bradykinesia, which is the clinical term for slowness to initiate
or complete movements. This generally influences all actions, eventually
even swallowing and blinking. Muscular rigidity makes seemingly simple
things like rolling over in bed extremely difficult or impossible. In
advanced Parkinson’s, a stooped appearance is assumed, due largely to the
loss of exterior muscle tone. The loss of this muscle also makes the limbs
resistant to outward movement, sometimes resulting in contracted knees,
elbows, and neck. Reflexes are also hindered; patients will walk with small,
careful steps, not swinging their arms. Some patient’s experience loss of
facial expression, drooling, the inability to speak clearly, loudly, or with
a change in tone. General aches and pains caused from stiffness, cramping,
and falling down are also a problem, as is imbalance.
Autonomic systems including cardiovascular, urinary and digestive
tracts may also be effected. This is manifested in high blood pressure,
urgency and frequency of urination, and a general slowness of the
gastrointestinal system, including constipation.
Depression and dementia are also associated with Parkinson’s, although
a concrete correlation has not been found. It is estimated that
approximately one third of individuals experience cognitive impairment.(5)
Given that the age of the typical Parkinson’s victim is over 60, a degree of
normal old age forgetting may cloud cognitive facilities (and the patient may
be suffering from some other disease, such as Alzheimer’s.) Some drugs used
to treat Parkinson’s also cause confusion and lack of clarity. About 40% of
individuals develop depression, usually within the first year of the disease.
Some think this may result from the dysfunction in neurotransmitter
processing, some think it is an understandable response to the realization
and endurance of such a difficult disease.(3)
Parkinson’s disease currently affects approximately one million
Americans, second only to Alzheimers. It has traditionally been seen as an
idiopathic, non-genetic disease, but a recent study has found that a
correlation does exist between twins. Researches found a listing of 17,000
twins listed in a World War II era registry and found that 161 pairs where at
least one brother had Parkinson’s. The results showed that there is a
genetic link, but only in early-onset Parkinson’s (cases that begin earlier
than fifty years old.) Only four pairs of identical twins and two sets of
fraternal twins were found to both have the disorder.(6) Another study found
that there might be an abnormal gene that is inherited, once again, only in
early-onset Parkinson’s. Out of eighty 1st degree relatives, 22.5% tested
abnormally on motor function, sense of smell and mood, while only 9% of the
control group did.(7) Mayo researchers recently discovered a chromosomal
mutation in a 6th generation Iowa family (who have continuously been affected
with Parkinson’s) that is helping solve the puzzle of it’s genetic path.
Ultimately however, it remains nearly impossible to predict whom Parkinson’s
will affect.(8)
If lack of dopamine is the only problem in Parkinson’s, why not simply
supply the needed substance? There is a barrier between bodily manufactured
dopamine and dopamine made in the brain that functions as a neurotransmitter.
The majority of an individual’s dopamine is made in the adrenal glands. It
is supplied to the bloodstream to work as a hormone, regulating blood
circulation and heart rate. If the mass quantity of dopamine produced
peripherally were able to permeate the brain, a delicate balance would be
upset. To prevent this there is an impervious membrane that surrounds the
brain neurons, called the blood brain barrier. This is why dopamine given
intravenously is not effective in treating Parkinson’s Disease.
Eventually scientists were able to find a building block, a chemical
component which would be allowed entry into the brain and provide remaining
nigral cells the needed parts to produce dopamine. It is called
levodihydroxyphenylalanine, thankfully abbreviated to levodopa, or L-dopa.
When given to patients parkinsonism, (the collective features of the disease)
reduces greatly. Originally doctors assumed they had found a cure for
Parkinson’s, but problems arose. Only about 1% of the administered levodopa
was absorbed in the brain. The remaining converted dopamine remained in the
body, causing heart palpitations and a racing pulse. In some cases it led to
a sustained twitching of the heart rather than an actual beating, and
affected blood pressure resulting in faintness or blackouts.
Fortunately, a drug was found that stopped levodopa from converting
into dopamine in the body, called carbipoda. The combination of levodopa and
carbipoda is put in pill form and marketed as Sinemet, (or various other
brand names). The drug is available in various ratios and tailored to each
individual patient. Other chemicals have been synthetically created to mimic
dopamine, called dopaminergic drugs. They are derived from a fungus called
ergot, and are most effective when administered in conjunction to levodopa.
Unfortunately, the beneficial effects of these drugs have been shown to only
last a few months, and in some cases have been toxic to certain organs.(3)
Though levodopa is currently the best and most effective treatment for
PD, it has its own possibly quite serious side effects.(9) Dyskinesia, which
refers to spastic, uncontrolled movement is common, as is the on/off
phenomenon, where the person has control over their muscles one minute and
the next does not. Dyskinesia, (meaning dys “disorder” and kinesia “motion”)
varies from periodic muscle contractions, to writhing limbs, to
uncontrollable dance like movements. This can cause fatigue, frustration,
and embarrassment. Generally, the higher the dosage of levodopa, the more
severe the dyskinesia. Generally, these episodes occur at the beginning or
end of the levodopa distribution period (when the percentage of dopamine is
at its lowest.) Symptoms may also include impaired mental concentration and
anxiety.(3)
A theory attempting to explain the “on-off phenomena” is when L-Dopa is
ingested, remaining dopaminergic neurons lose the ability to store dopamine
and develop a reliance on an exogenous supply. The medicine has a wax and
wane effect,(called pulsativity) which results in the fluctuation of motor
control. Because of this, dopamine agnostics have been becoming more popular
because they don’t have pulsativity, (or this stage is transient.) It is also
thought possible that they may slow the progression of the disease by being
neuroprotective. COMT inhibitors, entacapone (Comtan) and tolcapone
(Tasmar), are enzymes that brakes down levodopa, so when give concurrently,
increases Central Nervous System delivery of dopamine. It also provides a
more controlled concentration of levodopa, decreasing pulsativity.
Unfortunately, side effects to these drugs have included nausea, vomiting,
and psychiatric disturbances.
There are a plethora of drug treatments being given today.
Dopamineagnostics, selegiline, anticholinergics, amantiadine, and most recently
O-methyltransferase are in use. Beyond drugs, innovative new techniques such as
surgery and fetal tissue transplants are being explored. Researches have found
that if areas of the basal ganglia are destroyed, dyskinesias caused from
levodopa therapy lessened. Deep brain stimulation with microelectrodes in the
thalamus has been shown to control tremors.(9) President Reagan banned fetal
tissue research eleven years ago, but Clinton lifted the ban five years later.
Limited research since then has involved researches removing substancia nigral
cells from aborted fetuses and placing them in people with PD. Results are not
entirely conclusive but scientists are optimistic.(10)
Science is constantly progressing in phenomenal new ways. Very recently a
group of researchers (cooperating with scientists at the Sahlgrenska Hospital in
Sweden) in San Diego found that hippocampus brain cells can reproduce
themselves. This is a fascinating, ground breaking discovery that eradicates
the traditional belief that neurons cannot regenerate. Discoveries such as
these provide helpful new insight into the working’s of the brain, which may
lead to better understanding of Parkinson’s, as well as other enigmatic
neurophysiological illnesses such as Tourette Syndrome and Huntington’s
Disease.(11)
Physical therapy is an important part of dealing with all degenerative
illnesses. Muscle strengthening, stretching, and coordination practices help
the patient physically and emotionally. To asses the progress of their
patients, therapists often use timed walking intervals, writing coordination,
and common movement practices such as turning over in bed.(12) Sidney Dorros,
who was the first patient to undergo experimental L-dopa treatment, recommends
to people with Parkinson’s to learn as much about the disease as they can.
Sometimes patients may be hesitant to learn because they fear it will be too
depressing, but the opposite is usually true. Another important component to
actively coping with PD is to find the best doctor possible, not only one who is
medically competent, but who has a genuine interest in the patient’s experience
and narrative.(13) For some patient’s, including family and friend’s in medical
and perhaps therapeutic encounters can make things easier. Equally as important
is keeping in mind that medical advances are being made, resulting in the
symptoms and pathology of Parkinson’s becoming more tolerable.
Bibliography:
(1) Duvoisin, Roger C. Parkinson’s Disease, A Guide For Patient and
Family.
New York: Raven Press, 1978
(2) Martin, G. Neil. Human Neuropsychology.
London: Prentice Hall, 1998
(3) McGoon, Dwight C. The Parkinson’s Handbook.
New York: WW Norton & Company, 1990
(4) Lechtenberg, Richard. The Psychiatrist’s Guide to Diseases of the
Nervous System.
New York: Wiley Medical, 1982
(5) Stolberg, Sheryl Gay. “Reno Puts a Public Face on Often Private
Disease.”
The New York Times 15 August 1999: p. 16
(6) “Twin Study Links Parkinson’s Disease to Environment.”
The New York Times 2 Feb 1999: p. 12
(7) “Mayo Researchers Fit New Piece in Parkinson’s Puzzle.”
Medical Industry Today 21 Dec 1998
(8)“New Tests ID At Risk Relatives.”
American Healthline 11 March 1999
(9) Conley, Scott C., Kirchner, Jeffrey T. Post Graduate Medicine
August 1999: p. 41
(10) Stolberg, Sheryl Gay. “Decisive Moment on Parkinson’s Fetal
Transplant.”
The New York Times 20 April 1999: p.2
(11) Holcomb, B. Noble. “Adult Brain Cells said to Reproduce.”
New York Times 30 Oct 1998: p.1
(12) Guberman, Alan. An Introduction to Clinical Neurology.
Boston: Little, Brown, 1994
(13) Dorros, Sidney. Parkinson’s, A Patient’s View.
Washington D.C.: Sevent Locks Press, 1981
Huntington’s Chorea
Paul Achuff
In 1872, George Sumner Huntington presented before the Meigs and Mason
Academy of Medicine a paper about a hereditary form of chorea (Knight, 1992).
Although a hereditary disorder with presenting symptoms identical to what was
illustrated before the Academy of Medicine was expressed thirty years prior,
Huntington was the first to provide a clear and concise report regarding the
chorea. With his report shortly becoming the standard description of the
chorea, his name was quickly associated with the disease.
As a child, George Huntington would accompany his general practitioner
father as he made his rounds throughout Eastern Long Island. It was during
these trips that George would encounter his first cases of chorea. His
secluded early experiences with “Huntington’s” chorea lead him to believe
that it was exclusive to the east end of Long Island (Knight, 1992). As he
became more educated, this erroneous belief quickly dissipated. While the
precise origin of Huntington’s chorea remains unidentified, Huntington was
able to trace 1000 cases of the disease in twelve generations descendant from
two brothers living in Suffolk, England during the 17th century (Huntington,
1872). Irrespective of its origins, Huntington’s disease (HD) is now
worldwide. The incidence rate has been estimated at 2 to 7 per 100,000
persons (Martin, 1999) to 30 to 70 cases per million persons (Palo, et al.,
1987).
Huntington’s disease is now firmly established as a widespread hereditary
disorder marked by both psychological and physical changes occurring later in
life. This paper will first examine symptoms and consequences associated with
HD before delving into the neuropathology and aetiology of the disease.
Finally, treatment and presymptomatic testing will be discussed.
Like Parkinson’s disease, HD has an insidious onset and is characterized by
chorea and dementia. Greek for “dance”, chorea is most evocative of the
manner such patients present (Martin, 1999). The persistent idiosyncratic
patterns of involuntary flowing movements resemble the rhythmic flow of
dance. The initial stages of the disease are marked by irregular and fitful
action of the facial muscles and distal extremities. At this stage, the
misdiagnosis of a tic disorder is not uncommon. Moreover, only 60 percent of
patients are correctly diagnosed as having HD on their first admission to the
hospital (Knight, 1992). The slight choreic movements during the first stages
are easily voluntarily suppressed. Stereotyped movements include flexion of
the trunk or of a knee, bobbing of the head, and flexion and extension of the
fingers (Paulson, 1979). With the progression of the disease, however, the
movement disorder becomes more generalized. As more muscle groups become
involved movements become more obvious and occur with greater amplitude. As
the disorder progresses and involves the trunk, a distinctive gait develops.
Rigidity and dystonia predominate in the later stages of the disease. In the
nearly terminal stage, patients may display pelvicural contraction, a fetal
position of flexion with increased tone (Knight, 1992).
The symptoms seem to be intensified by stress. Moreover, the involuntary
movements are absent during sleep and can be easily controlled by others
without causing undue discomfort. Bradykinesia, while more characteristic of
Parkinson’s, is also found in patients with HD (Knight, 1992).
While fortunate individuals will manifest far more motor than mental
problems, it is rare to discover a patient with marked motor difficulty who
does not also manifest deficits in intellectual functioning. Indeed, slight
personality and behavioral changes may antedate the motor difficulties by up
to ten years (NINDS, 1998). In the five years subsequent from the genes
expression the most pronounced deterioration involves verbal, spatial,
arithmetic, and conceptual functions (Knight, 1992). However, the cognitive
impairments associated with HD do not generally develop in a uniform matter.
The inexorable progression of the disease soon results in dementia. In the
early stages of the disease, the dementia is not a global, homogeneous
decline in ability. Moreover, long term semantic memory and immediate recall
often persist throughout the progression of the disease (Knight, 1992).
Psychiatric symptoms reflect the degeneration of limbic and cognitive
circuits. Schizophrenic psychotic features such as delusions of grandeur,
suspiciousness, and excitability are seen in many patients as a consequence.
As the disease progresses to involve the prefrontal cortex, difficulties with
problem solving, planning, organization, and selective attention result
(Knight, 1992).
Clinical reports suggest that dementia and psychosis are more common in
Huntington’s than Parkinson’s disease (Lieberman, et al., 1979). Moreover,
although not considered to be an aphasia, speech becomes difficult and
dysarthic as the disease progresses. Although changes in the optic nerve are
not observed, ocular movements may also be impaired. No obvious sensory
deficits are seen in HD. Furthermore, patients with HD are often diagnosed
with depression (NINDS, 1998). The depression most likely results from the
progressive incapacitation and the inevitability of the disease.
In a retrospective study of 110 patients with HD, 39 per cent met the DSM
criteria for depression, 9 per cent met the criteria for schizophrenia, and
72 per cent displayed significant personality changes (Shiwach, 1994).
The transmission of HD is by autosomal dominant inheritance and is
characterized by progressive and selective neural cell atrophy resulting in
marked motor and cognitive deficits (Bradshaw, et al., 1998). Since it is an
autosomal dominant disease, the defective gene needs only to be inherited
from one parent. Each child of a HD parent has a 50/50 chance of inheriting
the HD gene. If the gene is inherited, it will be expressed. Although genetic
inheritance is the most likely cause of the disorder, it is possible for HD
to occur without familial genetic predisposition. Sporadic HD is thought to
be caused by a mutation of the gene during sperm development which results in
CAG repeats (Knight, 1992), which will be discussed later. While a child can
inherit the HD gene from either parent, sporadic HD is linked only to the
father.
Although expression can occur from childhood into late life, the age of
onset is generally around 40 to fifty years. The advancement of the disorder
is relentless, usually causing death in 15 to 20 years after onset (Martin,
1999). The disease progresses most rapidly in patients with juvenile onset
HD, and death often follows in 10 years (NINDS, 1998).
The disease has been genetically mapped to the tip of the short arm of
chromosome four, 4p16.3 precisely (MacDonald, et al., 1992). Huntington
disease is thought to result from the expansion of a trinucleotide (CAG)
repeat located in the coding region of the gene for the protein huntingtin.
An abnormal form of huntingtin is produced as a result of the repeated
cytosine adenine guanine sequence. The presence of the abnormal huntingtin
gene precedes HD. Some forms of familial Parkinson’s disease may also involve
trinucleotide repetition (Knight, 1992). Individuals who do not have HD
generally have 28 or fewer CAG repeats. Individuals with 40 or more repeats
will theoretically develop HD (NINDS, 1998).
Postmortem examinations of HD patients reveal distinct atrophy of the
striatum, particularly the head of the caudate nucleus, the anterior putamen,
and the globus pallidus (Martin, 1999). However, a generalized cortical
atrophy is also evident. Before death, neuronal atrophy of the striatum,
particularly the caudate nuclei, is evidenced by the reduction of glucose
metabolism within the cells. Atrophy of cortical layers 3,5, and 6 (Knight,
1992) is particularly responsible for an up to 20 per cent reduction in brain
size (Martin, 1999).
Although the specific cause of cell death in HD is as of yet unknown, one
common theory subsists. Excitotoxicity is the over stimulation of cells by
natural chemicals found in the brain. Glutamate and related acidic amino
acids apparently destroy neurons by excessive stimulation of excitatory
receptors located on the dendrosomal surfaces. The neuronal atrophy seen in
HD can be induced in animals by administering an excitatory amino acid
similar to glutamate, kainic acid. The strong excitatory effects of kainic
acid excessively stimulate excitatory receptors resulting in neuronal
depletion in the striatum. The excessive excitation of neurons produced by
activation of specific receptors could result in neural degeneration in
regions of the central nervous system where the amino acids accumulate
(Olney, 1979). Furthermore, GABAergic and cholinergic striatal neurons are
systematically altered as a result of the excessive stimulation.
Consequently, the dopaminergic nigrostriatal fibers become uninhibited,
resulting in the predomination of dopamine over acetylcholine. The elevated
levels of the excitatory dopamine may possibly cause the choreic movements.
Moreover, the overactivity of the dopaminergic system may be responsible for
producing the schizophrenic features in HD.
As mentioned, the efficacy of the cholinergic system in HD patients appears
to be diminished. A decreased muscarinic receptor concentration and decreased
values of cholineacetyl tranferase have been reported (Barbeau, 1979).
Deficient levels of GABA have also been reported in patients with HD (Perry,
et al., 1973). Low cerebral spinal fluid levels of GABA and decreased levels
of cortical glutamic acid decarboxylase provide supporting evidence (Barbeau,
1979).
While there is no available treatment to stop, delay, or reverse the course
of the disease, pharmaceutical intervention may help keep clinical symptoms
under control. Neuroleptics may help alleviate choreic movements and may help
control schizophrenic features, apparently by regulating the dopaminergic
system (Knight, 1992). SSRIs are generally prescribed to combat depression.
Lithium may be prescribed to control lability and benzodiazepines may be used
to alleviate anxiety (NINDS, 1998).
The knowledge that HD is genetically inherited raises many personal ethical
issues. Accompanying the discovery of the HD gene in 1983 was the ability and
desire to perform presymptomatic testing. Since 97 to 99 per cent of HD is
inherited (Knight, 1992), presymptomatic testing allows at risk individuals
to determine whether they have the disease. For those diagnosed with HD,
there are immediate problems with adjustment. Reactions range from “relief
and calm to depression or despair” (NINDS, 1998). If the diagnosis is
unexpected, suicide is common. Even if a person is unaffected, he must accept
the stark realization that other family members probably possess the
defective gene.
Ethical dilemmas arise with the realization that HD can currently only be
eradicated by the avoidance of reproduction. This is made more difficult by
the late manifestation of the disease. The gene may be passed onto the next
generation before the disease is realized. However, prenatal testing allows
genetic material from a fetus to be analyzed. Since the probability of
inheriting and not inheriting the disease is equal, predictive testing using
fetal tissue can determine more precisely the risk factor. If the parent is
completely opposed to abortion, this test should probably not be performed.
Regardless, at risk individuals should seek genetic counseling prior to
conception to alleviate any problems. Future advances in presymptomatic
testing and in vitro fertilization may someday lead to the elimination of the
disease.
Bibliography
Barbeau A. Update on the biochemistry of Huntington’s chorea. Advances in
Neurology Vol 23, TN Chase, NS Wexler, A Barbeau, ed. Raven Press:New York,
1979, pp. 449 to 461
Bradshaw JL, et al. Motor sequencing problems in Parkinson’s disease,
Huntington’s disease, and Tourette’s syndrome 1: a review of basal ganglia
involvement. Motor Behavior and Human Skill: A Multidisciplinary Approach, JP
Piek, ed. Human Kinetics:Champaign, IL, 1998, pp. 305 to 317
Huntington G. On chorea. Med Surg Reporter 26:317 to 321, 1872
Knight RG. The Neuropsychology of Degenerative Brain Diseases. Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates:New Jersey, 1992
Lieberman A, et al. Dementias of Huntington’s and Parkinson’s disease.
Advances in Neurology Vol 23, TN Chase, NS Wexler, A Barbeau, ed. Raven
Press:New York, 1979, pp. 273 to 289
Martin GN. Human Neuropsychology. Prentice Hall:London, 1999
MacDonald ME, et al. The Huntington’s disease candidate region exhibits many
different haplotypes. Nature Genet 1:99 to 103, 1992
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.
19 Nov 98. http://www.ninds.nih.gov
Olney JW. Excitotoxic amino acids and Huntington’s disease. . Advances in
Neurology Vol 23, TN Chase, NS Wexler, A Barbeau, ed. Raven Press:New York,
1979, pp. 609 to 624
Palo J, Somer H, Ikonen E, Karila L, Peltonen L. Low prevalence of
Huntington’s disease in Finland. Lancet I:805 to 806, 1987
Paulson GW. Diagnosis of Huntington’s disease. Advances in Neurology Vol 23,
TN Chase, NS Wexler, A Barbeau, ed. Raven Press:New York, 1979, pp. 177 to
184
Perry TL, Hansen S, Lesk D, Kloster M. Amino acids in plasma, cerebrospinal
fluid, and brain of patients with Huntington’s chorea. Advances in Neurology
Vol 1:Huntington’s Chorea, A Barbeau, TN Chase, GW Paulson, ed. Raven Press:
New York, 1973, pp. 609 to 621
Shiwach R. Psychopathology in Huntington’s disease patients. Acta Psychiatry
Scand 90:241 to 246, 1994
Return to the Project Table of Contents
Copyright © 1999, Dr. John M. Morgan, All rights reserved -
This page last edited 19 - November, 1999
If you have any feedback for the author, E-mail me