Alcohol: A pharmacological approach
History
By Jenna Devoid
"Virtually all cultures-whether hunter-gatherers or
farmers; whether technologically advanced or primitive-share two
universals: the development of a noodle and the discovery and
use of the natural fermentation process (1)."
Alcohol and humans share a long and sordid story. The tale
reveals a great deal about people and how we have developed and
evolved as a culture. Filled with the drama and twists of a
soap opera, the story includes politics, religion, philosophy,
psychology, medicine and social evolution.
The story begins 10,000 to 15,000 years ago, when alcohol
use by humans is thought to have begun (1). Alcohol is a
naturally occurring process; airborne yeasts ferment sugars into
alcohol in rotting fruit (3). Primates are known to eat rotting
fruit for its intoxicating effects and it is thought that humans
got the idea from them and decided to try it out for themselves
(1).
There is a strain of belief among anthropologists that
mead, as "beer" was formerly known, is responsible for the
development of civilization. The idea is that in order to
process alcohol, one necessitates a stable location (1). Other
accounts assert that agriculture would have needed to predate
brewing due to a lack of naturally occurring sugars that are
needed to produce alcohol on a larger scale (3). The ancient
Greeks, Celts, Norse, Summerians, Egyptians and Babylonians have
all documented the production and use of alcohol (4).
The pervasive use of alcohol in ancient times had a
utilitarian source, the lack of clean drinking water made
alcohol use a matter of health. In fact, the first beer used as
a matter of practice (approximately around 8,000 B.C.), was very
thick and nutritious with many needed vitamins and amino acids
(1). Alcohol has also had an important place in human cultures.
The Greeks and Romans had Dionysus and Bacchus (respectfully),
the god of wine, who they worshiped in an "orgy of intoxication"
(4). Alcohol has been involved throughout human history with
burials, settling disputes, offering courage in war,
celebration, consummating settlements and "seducing lovers" (4).
What seems evident is that as long as alcohol has been
enjoyed by humans, it has also been the source of social
problems. In the world's very first legal text, developed by
the Babylonians, regulations and laws for imbibing houses are
present and their texts reveal societal problems caused by
drunkenness (3). Ancient Egyptian (4), Roman and Greek texts
also includes warnings and concerns surrounding alcohol (3).
Before and into the Middle Ages brewing was traditionally
done primarily by women, as beer was considered a food. In the
middle ages superstitions were rampant and failures with the
process of brewing would be blamed on "brew witches" and the
devil. Brew witches were burned for their infractions, with the
last known burning occurring in 1591. Monks were also avid
brewers. It was brewed to sell and also for personal
consumption. Beer added some flavor to an otherwise bland diet.
It was allowed during the monks' fasts, offering nutrition;
historical accounts find that each monk was allotted 5 liters of
beer a day (4).
Prohibition first reared its head in the 17th century. The
Plymouth Colony regulated the "sale of spirits" to no "more than
2 pence worth to anyone but strangers just arrived" in 1633.
Many early colonial writings reveal attempts at regulation of
excessive alcohol use in members of the community. This was in
response to the unattractive behavior it inspired in community
members such as ministers and the dangerous behaviors it evoked
in Natives (2). It was also around this time and into the next
century that alcoholism gained understanding as a disease rather
than a moral failing by the health community (5).
By the 18th century a new incentive to regulate alcohol
became apparent: money. For the first time in history alcohol
manufacturing, importation, selling and consumption met
prohibitions. Regulation focused on fines, taxes and fees for
licensing. There were fines for selling alcohol to Natives,
drunken behavior, and production without a license (2).
The New England Federalists fountainheaded the early
temperance movement. The first to assert the health benefits of
temperance was Nathanial Ames in 1752 in an almanac wherein he
wrote: "Strong Waters were formerly used only by the Direction
of Physicians; but now Mechanicks and low-li'd Labourers drink
Rum like Fountain-Water, and they can infinitely better endure
it than the idle. Unactive and sendentary Part of Mankind, but
DEATH is at the bottom of the cup of every one (2)." Also
emerging as a strong voice in this movement was Benjamin Rush
who was one of the first voices disputing the common belief in
the medicinal benefits of alcohol (4). He defined the symptoms
of alcohol use as "unusual garrulity, unusual silence,
captiousness…an insipid simpering…profane swearing…certain
immodest actions [and] certain extravagant acts which indicate a
temporary fit of madness" in 1785 (2). Despite the voices of
temperance emerging, little if any effect has been found to have
occurred at that time.
In 1791 the Revenue Act was passed by Alexander Hamilton
which included a tax on distilled liquors. This incited the
Whisky Rebellion which was composed mostly of angry farmers in
the Western part of Pennsylvania. They mobbed collectors of the
taxes and it eventually took 15,000 militia to control the armed
farmers(2). Around this time religious organizations began to
come out against the sale and use of alcohol, including the
Methodists, Presbyterian Synod of Pennsylvania and the Yearly
Meeting of Friends of New England (2).
In 1826 The American Temperance Society (later the American
Temperance Union) was born and by 1835 there were 8,000 local
groups. In 1842 The Sons of Temperance came to be. Both called
for total abstinence from alcohol (2). The first prohibition
law was passed shortly after in 1851 in Maine, followed by
twelve other states (3). Between 1863 and 1868 the liquor and
beer tax rose from 20 cents to two dollars per gallon. However,
the revenue taken in did not increase, as fraud and loophole
enactment was rampant. In 1869 the tax was reduced to fifty
cents per gallon and revenue increased from 13.5 million dollars
in 1868 to 45 million dollars in 1869 (2).
In 1869 the National Prohibition Party was formed, which
won a seat in the House of Representatives in 1890 (3). Three
years later the Anti-Saloon League was formed (3). This group
would later be called "the most dangerous political movement
that this country has ever known". It asserted that "liquor is
responsible for 19% of the divorces, 25% of the poverty, 25% of
the insanity, 37% of the pauperism, 45% of child desertion, and
50% of the crime in this country…and this is a conservative
estimate (2)."
As the 19th century turned into the 20th century a great deal
of social change was taking place in the United States. In the
1870's the feminist movement which had begun in the early part
of the century began to add their voices to the temperance
movement. This was marked by the development of the Women's
Crusade (b. 1873) and the Women's Christian Temperance Union (b.
1874). The latter saw the issue as crucial to creating equality
between the sexes. The leader Frances E. Willard asserted,
"Drink and tobacco are the great separatists between men and
women. Once they used these things together, but woman's
evolution has carried her beyond them; man will climb to the
same level…but meanwhile…the fact that he permits himself fleshy
indulgence that he would deprecate in her, makes their planes
different, giving her an instinct of revulsion (2)."
By 1902 the temperance movement was beginning to have an
impact. In public schools "temperance education" was
implemented, texts as rich with misinformation as facts were
used (2). But it was the labor unions, motivated by impairment
of workers that are cited as contributing the most to the
temperance movement (2).
It became clear that an individual was either for or
against prohibition, with little to no room between these
polarities. Workers viewed the fight for prohibition as
paternalistic and resented the judgment towards themselves and
their behaviors (2).
National prohibition, known as the Volstead Act or the 18th
Amendment, was instated from 1913 to 1933, a result of an
amalgamation of strength gained in the temperance movements, the
war and the pairing of alcohol with immigrants in a time of
rigid patriotism (2). However, the prohibition has been
considered a failure due to bootlegging. Speakeasies were
numbered at 200,000 to 500,000 throughout the United States. In
1928 doctors earned $40 million dollars writing prescriptions
for whiskey (2). Indeed, there was a great deal of money to be
made bootlegging, Al Capone's annual gains from bootlegging were
estimated to be at $60 million (3)! Sacramental wine was exempt
from the Volstead Act and suspicious amounts of wine were
consumed via the churches. Also, the age at which folks started
to drink dropped during prohibition (see figure below)(2).
Period Males Females
1914 21.4 27.9
1920-23 20.6 25.8
1936-37 23.9 31.7
Essentially, "prohibition destroyed the manufacturing and
distributive agencies through which the demand for liquor had
been legally supplied. But the demand remained (2)."
When Roosevelt and a "wet" Congress were voted into office
in 1933 the repeal amendment hit the floor February 14, 1933 and
passed two days later 63 to 23.
Altho alcohol's popularity in American society peaked
around 1830, and per capita estimates of use have dropped from
2.76 gal. of pure alcohol in 1980 to 2.35 gal. in 1996, it
remains a popular part of the culture and part of a societal
problem. Ten percent of users of alcohol account for 50% of
alcohol consumed (1).
References
1.Doweiko, H.E. (2002). Concepts of Chemical Dependency,
5th ed. Brooks/Coles.
2. History of Alcohol Prohibition (n.d.). Retrieved April 2,
2005 from http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/Library/studi
es/nc/nc2a.htm.
3. Alcohol in History (n.d.). Retrieved April 2, 2005 from
http://www.ephidrina.org/alcohol/history.html.
4. The History of Alcohol (n.d.). Retrieved April 2, 2005
From http://www.drug-rehab.org/alcoholhistory.php.
5. Waguespack, R.S. A History of Drug Use, Abuse and
Addiction: History of Alcohol (n.d.). Retrieved April 2,
2005 from http://www.adjunctcollege.com/Unit_2_Summary.
html.
Route access, neurotransmitters and ion channels
By Joanna Rocco
The chemical formula for alcohol or ethanol is C2 H5 OH.
Alcohol is the most popular and widely used drug in today's
society. It is usually consumed as a beverage and so enters the
body orally. From the mouth it travels to the stomach where 20%
of the alcohol is absorbed. It then moves on to the small
intestine where 80% is absorbed. The alcohol will circulate in
the blood stream until it is metabolized by the liver. The
alcohol molecule is extremely small. It is very water soluble
and somewhat soluble in fats or lipids. Due to its small size
and solubility the alcohol molecule moves freely throughout the
body and easily crosses the blood brain barrier (Palfai &
Jankiewicz, 2001).
Alcohol is a powerful substance that affects the brain in
many ways. Alcohol does not have a specific neurotransmitter
binding site in the brain, but rather involves complex
interactions in various parts of the brain. In order to see how
alcohol may affect the human brain, researchers have mapped
alcohol induced changes in rat brains. Low doses of alcohol
created changes in the neocortex, hippocampus and hypothalamus.
This would account for some of the reinforcing properties of
alcohol as well as some of the negative effects. It is
theorized that continued exposure to alcohol may change neuron
functioning and receptors in the hippocampus and the
hypothalamus (Ryabinin, Criado, Heniksen, Bloom, & Wilson, 1997.
It is still being researched whether or not alcohol alone
can cause brain damage. The brains of alcoholics do show a
reduction in brain size and some permanent loss of white matter.
There also appears to be the loss of neurons in the frontal
cortex, hypothalamus and cerebellum. Loss of a certain amount
of functioning and cognitive ability in long term drinkers may
be related to brain damage, dendritic and synaptic changes, and
significant receptor and transmitter alterations (Harper, 1998).
As a drug, alcohol is classified as a depressant. Alcohol
slows down brain activity by reducing excitatory actions of the
neurotransmitter glutamate and raising the inhibitory actions of
gamma aminobutyric acid or GABA. Alcohol can also activate or
stimulate serotonin receptor subtypes which stimulate production
of dopamine and subsequent release of DA by the nucleus
accumbens region of the brain. Dopamine is involved in complex
motor activities (think of someone who's had too much to drink
stumbling around). Dopamine and the nucleus accumbens both play
important roles in reward and motivation, two key components of
addiction (Charness, 1990).
Alcohol also affects serotonin (5 HT) levels in the blood.
Serotonin plays an important role in emotion, attention and
motivation. It is not known specifically if alcohol increases
serotonin release or inhibits its uptake, only that there are
higher levels of serotonin in the blood after drinking even a
small amount of alcohol. Alcohol also disturbs the serotonin
receptor's ability to work properly. There are certain
serotonin receptor subtypes that seem to be influenced by
alcohol. 5 HT1A may direct behaviors related to the consumption
of alcohol. 5 HT1B seems to be a factor in intoxication and
tolerance. 5 HT2 may play a part in reward and withdrawal. 5
HT3 seems to have a role in the rewarding effects of alcohol.
Rats selectively bred to prefer alcohol have lower levels of
serotonin than normal rats, suggesting that alcoholics may be
trying to raise or normalize their own serotonin levels by
drinking (Lovinger, 1999).
Alcohol affects NMDA and GABA receptors, which in turn
activate ion channels. This is one of the primary ways in which
alcohol impacts the nervous system. Ion channels play a role in
stimulating activity at the neuronal synapse and by creating
action potentials. When one ingests alcohol, GABA and NMDA open
a pore or ion channel in the cell membrane which allows
electrically charged atoms to enter and affect the cell's
balance. Alcohol causes intoxication and incoordination by
inhibiting these NMDA glutamate ion channels. Euphoria and
sedation are contributed to by alcohol's effect on gycine,
nicotinic, cholinergic and sertotonergic ion channels (Crews,
Morrow, Criswell, & Breese, 1996).
At the site of the ion channels alcohol alters neuronal
calcium transport. Once the calcium is elevated within the
neuron, transport of calcium is inhibited. GABA activated
chloride channels are also sensitive to alcohol. If one takes
drugs that stop the action of alcohol on chloride channels,
intoxication is reduced. Alcohol, as well as other drugs that
cause intoxication, hinder the flow if sodium through synaptic
membrane channels. Lastly, alcohol augments calcium activated
potassium channels which have an inhibitory impact (Harris &
Allan, 1989).
Alcohols effect on the body's systems is incredibly
complex. Alcohol affects brain processes such as attention,
memory and mood. Excessive use of alcohol can also create
dependence and withdrawal. Alcohol interacts with many
neurotransmitter systems and upsets the brain's subtle balance
between inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmitters. Inhibitory
neurotransmitters reduce sensitivity of other neurons to
additional stimulation and excitatory neurotransmitters produce
a converse effect. This delicate balance is necessary for
normal functioning. Long term ingestion of alcohol can also
change neurotransmitter systems, eventually leading to craving
and alcohol seeking behavior (Valenzuela, 1997).
References
Charness, M.E. (1990). Alcohol and the brain. Alcohol Health and
Research World, 14, 85-89.
Crews, F.T., Morrow, A.L., Criswell, H., & Breese, G. (1996).
Effects of ethanol on ion channels. International Review of
Neurobiology, 39, 283-367.
Harper, C. (1998). The neuropathology of alcohol specific brain
damage, or does alcohol damage the brain? Journal of
Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, 57, 101-110.
Harris, R.A., & Allan, A.M. (1989). Alcohol intoxication: ion
channels and genetics. Alcohol Neurochemistry, 3, 1689-1695.
Lovinger, D.M. (1999). The role of serotonin in alcohol's effect
on the brain. Current Separations, 18, 23-28.
Palfai, T., & Jankiewicz, H. (2001). Drugs and human behavior
(2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Ryabinin, A.E., Criado, J.R., Henriksen, S.J., Bloom, F.E., &
Wilson, M.C. (1997). Differential sensitivity of c Fos
expression in hippocampus and other brain regions to moderate
and low doses of alcohol. Molecular Psychiatry, 2, 32-43.
Valenzuela, C.F. (1997). Alcohol and neurotransmitter
interactions. Alcohol Health and Research World, 21, 144-148.
Primary behavior changes and side effects
By Heather French
EFFECTS ON THE BRAIN AND CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM
The primary behavior effects of alcohol are its
psychoactive and disinhibition effects. This is caused when the
alcohol interferes with the normal working ability of inhibitory
neurons in the cortex (Doweiko, 2002). The cells are not
destroyed, but rather they are impaired in their normal
functioning due to the depressant action of the alcohol.
Restoration of cellular functioning occurs when the alcohol is
oxidized. (Carroll, 1975).
Alcohol, a neurotoxin, can affect memory formation after a
single drink. In some cases, the individual may experience the
inability to remember events that occurred during intoxication.
This is known as a blackout Doweiko, 2002). Prolonged, heavy
alcohol use reduces the sensitivity of the Central Nervous
System to alcohol's effects. It is this tolerance to alcohol
that leads the user to increasing the dosage consumed in order
to achieve the same effect (Carroll, 1975).
Due to thiamine deficiency, approximately 15 to 20 percent
of chronic alcohol users develop a condition known as Wernicke
Korsakoff syndrome. Wernicke Korsakoff syndrome is exhibited by
a pattern of brain damage that results in confusion to the point
of deliriousness or disorientation (Doweiko, 2002). Various
studies that compared men and women on their vulnerability to
alcohol induced brain damage have yielded interesting results.
Although there has been some conflicting evidence, it has been
recently suggested that alcoholic women are more susceptible to
alcohol induced brain damage than are alcoholic men (Hommer,
2003).
EFFECTS ON SEXUALITY
The consumption of alcohol decreases testicular synthesis
and increases metabolic disposition of testosterone. This
results in an increased leutinizing hormone that is thought to
be responsible for increasing sex drive (Cohen, 1983). While
short term effects of alcohol consumption may actually lead to
increased sexual desire, long term alcohol abuse can lead to
impotence. It appears that alcohol may impair or destroy the
neurological function that causes an erection (Carroll, 1975).
Additionally, studies of alcoholics have shown that their sex
life was deficient and ineffectual, and that even with sobriety,
impotency may be irreversible (NIAAA, 1980).
EFFECTS ON THE CARDIOVASCULAR AND SKELETAL SYSTEM
The initial effect of alcohol is a slight increase in heart
rate and blood pressure. Alcohol also dilates the peripheral
blood vessels, contributing to loss of body heat, thereby
decreasing body temperature (Carroll, 1975). It has been
suggested that as many as 50 percent of individuals with chronic
alcoholism are prone to myopathy of skeletal muscles. Myopathy
is characterized by selective atrophy of Type II fibres and up
to a 30 percent reduction in entire muscle mass (Preedy, Adachi,
Ueno, Ahmed, Mantle, & Mullatti, 2001). It has also been
suggested that alcoholism leads to cardiomyopathy, and that
alcohol is toxic to striated muscle (Urbano Marquez, Estruch,
Navarro Lopez, Grau, Mont, & Rubin, 1989).
EFFECTS ON THE LIVER
Due to the liver being primarily responsible for alcohol
metabolism, the liver is very vulnerable to alcohol-related
injury. Alcohol liver disease (ALD) is a potentially fatal
condition due to prolonged, heavy alcohol use. ALD consists of
three conditions: fatty liver, alcoholic hepatitis, and
cirrhosis (Carroll, 1975; Marsano, et al., 2003).
The existence of a fatty liver, or steatosis, occurs in
about 20 percent of alcoholics. There are no symptoms besides
an enlarged liver and symptoms can often be reversed if alcohol
consumption in stopped (Mann, Smart, & Govoni, 2004). Fatty
liver is often a precursor to an inflammatory liver disorder
called alcoholic hepatitis (Mann, Smart, & Govoni, 2004).
Alcohol hepatitis is characterized by fever, nausea,
elevated white blood count, jaundice, and abdominal pain. There
is approximately a 50 percent mortality rate for severe cases,
and about 40 percent of cases will develop into the most serious
of all of the liver diseases, cirrhosis (Mann, Smart, & Govoni,
2004).
Cirrhosis typically develops after years of excessive
alcohol use. This is characterized by widespread scarring of
the liver, which results in a shriveling and hardening of the
fibrous tissue (Carroll, 1975; Marsano, et al., 2003).
Furthermore, it has been found that patients with both alcoholic
hepatitis and cirrhosis have a death rate greater than 60% over
a 4 year period (Marsano, et al., 2003).
EFFECTS ON PERSONAL AND FAMILIAL LIFE, AND EMPLOYMENT
It is known that alcohol abuse can be responsible for
personal and familial disruptions. Indeed, alcoholism is often
characterized as "the family disease" because of its effects on
emotional, physical, spiritual, and economic aspects of the
entire family (Carroll, 1975).
The individual with alcohol addiction may experience such
psychological complications as frustration due to decreased
efficiency, and having a preoccupation with drinking.
Alcoholics may also experience feeling a loss of control, as
exhibited through confabulation, passing out, memory lapses, and
drinking binges (Palfai & Jankiewicz, 2001).
Difficulties with employment, and possible death or injury
by alcohol related accident are also major areas of concern for
the individual addicted to alcohol. It is estimated that more
than 75 percent of the alcoholics in the United States are
employed (NIAAA, 1980). Although the individual who abuses
alcohol frequently continues to work full-time, as alcohol use
increases there is often an increase in decreased productivity,
unauthorized absenteeism, and poor coworker relations (Carroll,
1975).
Lastly, Drinking and driving is a prevalent cause of
automobile accidents, as well as Driving Under the Influence
(DUI) citations each year (Carroll, 1975). It has been
estimated that alcohol is involved in roughly one-third to one-
half of all highway fatalities. In addition, alcohol has been
implicated in injury and death resulting from home, industrial,
and recreational accidents (NIAAA, 1980).
References
Carroll, C. (1975). Alcohol: Use, nonuse, and abuse (2nd ed.)
WM. C. BROWN COMPANY PUBLISHERS: Dubuque, IO.
Cohen, S. (1983). The alcoholism problems. The Haworth Press:
New York.
Doweiko, H. (Ed.) (2002). Concepts of chemical dependency (5th
ed). Pacific Grove, CA: BROOKS/COLE.
Facts about alcohol and alcoholism. (1980). Rockville, MD:
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
Hommer, D. (2003). Male and female sensitivity to alcohol-
induced brain damage. Alcohol Research and Health, 27, 181-185.
Palfai, T., & Jankiewicz, H. (2001). Drugs and human behavior
(2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Preedy, V., Adachi, J., Ueno, Y., Ahmed, S., Mantle, D., &
Mullatti, N. (2001). Alcoholic skeletal muscle myopathy:
definitions, features, contribution of neuropathy, impact and
diagnosis. European Journal of Neurology, 8, 677-687.
Urbano Marquez, D., Estruch, R., Navarro Lopez, F., Grau, J.,
Mont, L., & Rubin, E. (1989). The effects of alcoholism on
skeletal and cardiac muscle. The New England Journal of
Medicine, 320, 409-415.
Treatment and effects of alcoholism
By Kiersten Kotaka
"Alcoholism must no longer be thought of as a single
disease with a cause that is either genetic or environmental but
as a group of illnesses in which the influences of genes and the
environment ebb and flow over the course of the at-risk
lifetime." (Devor 1994)
The research questions have evolved from whether there is a
hereditary risk to the search for specific genes that contribute
to the risk of alcoholism (Devor 1994). Devor explains that the
developmental alcoholism model is composed of five parts. In the
first part alcoholism specific genes confer the primary risk to
developing the disease. In the second part of the model, if two
or more primary risk genes are present in any one individual the
possibility of primary gene-gene interactions exist. The third
part recognizes the primary risk genotype that exists in a
developmental milieu composed of the rest of the genome. Devor
goes on to explain the fourth part of this model which
recognizes the role of nongenetic factors in modifying the
entire relevant genotype. The fifth part of the model suggests
that the levels of interaction, the numbers of primary risk
genes and secondary modifying loci are relatively small and
manageable. "The overall effect of this interactive
developmental is to produce precisely the types of clinical
variations observed (age of onset, sex differences, response to
treatment, severity, and familiality." (Devor 1994)
In 2003, 74% of adults age 21 or older reported that they
had started drinking alcohol before the legal drinking age of
21. (SAMHSA's National Survey on Drug Use and Health). The
trajectories of alcohol and drug use and dependence from
adolescence to adulthood was studied by Chasin, Flora, and King
(2004). Participants recruited for their study included
participants from an ongoing study of parental alcoholism
sampled from court records for driving under the influence of
alcohol. At time 1 there were 454 adolescents ranging in age
from 10.5 to 15.5 years. 246 of them had at least one alcoholic
biological parent who was also a custodial parent and 208
demographically matched adolescents with no alcoholic biological
or custodial parents (control group). There were three annual
assessments of the adolescents and their parents and two long
term follow-ups (Times 4 and 5). The follow ups were done when
the original adolescents were age 18-23, and 22-30.
The researchers looked at parent alcoholism and
psychopathology, alcohol consumption, drug consumption, alcohol
and drug dependence diagnoses, adolescent negative emotionality
and impulsivity, and young adult personality. The researchers
modeled the trajectories as a function of age rather than of
measurement occasion. They found that only 11.3% of the
participants were lifelong abstainers from alcohol and drugs.
"The most common trajectory involved moderate alcohol use
coupled with low levels of drug use and it was also relatively
common for individuals to drink lightly and infrequently with
only very rare drug use" (Chassin, Flora, & King 2004). Most
participants (61%) did not develop drug or alcohol dependence
over the course of the study. Members of the heavy drinking
group (20% of participants) were likely to be children of
alcoholics and had the densest family histories of alcoholism.
The researchers found that those people with dense family
histories (averaging more than one first degree alcoholic
relative) were overrepresented in both the comorbid and alcohol
dependence only groups. The major limitation of this study is
that it followed participants only to the age of thirty.
Binge drinking is defined as the 5 consecutive drinks for a
man, and 4 consecutive drinks for a woman. In a study of student
reports about drinking behaviors and harms collected through the
Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study, Weitzman
and Nelson (2004) gave four measures of alcohol consumption and
five measures of alcohol related consequences to 49,163 college
students. They found that as the level of alcohol consumption
increased so did the self report of drinking related harms. The
analyses of the data revealed that the bulk of drinking related
harms reported by college students are from drinkers who drink
at nonextreme levels. They also found that most drinkers did not
consume large quantities of alcohol. The researchers suggest
that " from a public health perspective, targeting the entire
population, including nonextreme drinkers, using environmental
prevention strategies is both logical and likely to yield
substantial community wide reductions in harm" (Weitzman &
Nelson 2004).
References
Chassin, L., Flora,D. & King, K. (2004) Trajectories of alcohol
and drug use and dependence from adolescence to adulthood: the
effects of familial alcoholism and personality. Journal of
Abnormal Psychology, 483-498.
Devor,E. (1994). A developmental genetic model of alcoholism:
Implications for genetic research. Journal of Consulting and
Clinical Psychology, 62, 1108-1115.
Gender Differences in Substance Dependence and Abuse.
Http://www.drugabusestatistics.samhsa.gov/2k4/genderDependence/g
enderDependence.cfm. 4/2/05.
Weitzman, E., & Nelson,T. (2004) College student binge drinking
and the "prevention paradox" Implications for prevention and
harm reduction. Journal of Drug Education, 34, 247-266.
The End
Go back to the beginning
Copyright © 2005, Dr. John M. Morgan, All rights reserved -
This page last edited 04-23, 2004
If you have any feedback for the author, E-mail me