Persuasion will not work in a "policy" speech if we do not recognize the need to change.
| Note | Symbol Key: | Interpretation |
| ! = |
SUPERIOR |
You really primed us to hear a good plan to solve answer the need. We were convinced there was a need to change. |
| + = |
EFFECTIVE |
You used a lot of good facts and support to establishing a need for your policy topic. |
| + = |
PROBLEMATIC |
You should go further in establishing a need for change. Unless we are fully informed of why there is a need (and believe it) we are less likely to listen seriously to your solution |
| – = |
DETRIMENTAL |
Your attempts to address the issue of need actually worked against you; we were not convinced. |
| Ø = |
MISSING | You did not address the issue of "need." |
NO NEED |
NO NEED TO CHANGE | You clearly laid out why there is no need for the current policy. |
TOO MUCH |
TOO MUCH TIME SPENT | Too much of your speech time was spent in establishing need at the expense of developing a good plan. |